US3612446A - Means and method for preventing the formation of audible frequencies in fluids passing over an airfoil section - Google Patents
Means and method for preventing the formation of audible frequencies in fluids passing over an airfoil section Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US3612446A US3612446A US865305A US3612446DA US3612446A US 3612446 A US3612446 A US 3612446A US 865305 A US865305 A US 865305A US 3612446D A US3612446D A US 3612446DA US 3612446 A US3612446 A US 3612446A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- frequencies
- fluids
- airfoil section
- section
- passing over
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C21/00—Influencing air flow over aircraft surfaces by affecting boundary layer flow
- B64C21/02—Influencing air flow over aircraft surfaces by affecting boundary layer flow by use of slot, ducts, porous areas or the like
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C2230/00—Boundary layer controls
- B64C2230/02—Boundary layer controls by using acoustic waves generated by transducers
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C2230/00—Boundary layer controls
- B64C2230/04—Boundary layer controls by actively generating fluid flow
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C2230/00—Boundary layer controls
- B64C2230/14—Boundary layer controls achieving noise reductions
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C2230/00—Boundary layer controls
- B64C2230/20—Boundary layer controls by passively inducing fluid flow, e.g. by means of a pressure difference between both ends of a slot or duct
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
- Y02T50/00—Aeronautics or air transport
- Y02T50/10—Drag reduction
Definitions
- the conversion is accomplished by two different approaches: (1) providing organ pipe configurations in the surface of the airfoil section that contacts the.
- FIG. 1 is a fragmentary top plan view of an aircraft with organ pipe configurations formed therein;
- FIG. 2 is a transverse sectional view taken through a wing of the aircraft along the plane 2-2 of FIG. 1;
- FIG. 3 is a transverse sectional view taken through an airfoil section defining a blade
- FIGS. 4 and 5 are diagrammatic views showing waves produced in a cavity and in a pipe, respectively.
- FIG. 6 is a section through an airfoil section in which oscillators, or the like, are used to vibrate the surface thereof that contacts the fluids.
- FIG. 1 show an aircraft designate generally at A having wings B projecting laterally from the fuselage C, with jet engines D arranged to advance the aircraft.
- the wings B define airfoil sections.
- the tin l and rudder I1 define an airfoil section; and, likewise, the stabilizer l2 and elevator 13 define an airfoil section.
- blade E of the engine D has been disclosed, and it defines an airfoil section.
- the source of fluid disturbance previously mentioned is usually an airfoil configuration or section, such as the intake compressor blades of the engine D; the power producing or high velocity gas deflecting blades; the leading edges 14 of the wings B and empennage (tail) surfaces in the case of speeds over Mach l,'or the speed of sound, thus resulting in sonic boom.
- organ pipe configurations F If such points of origin, or source of fluid disturbance, i.e., the surface of the airfoil section that contacts the air or gases (flow indicated by arrows 15 in FIGS. 2 and 6), is covered with suitable organ pipe configurations F, the fluid will be put into motion at frequencies imparted by the organ pipe configurations F, rather than being converted at a later time as in previous research on ultrasonic silencers for engines.
- organ pipe configurations F can be in the form of small holes in the air contact surface of the blades E, or leading edge or the wind B or empennage (or for that matter any fluid disturbing surface), or they may be grooves or slots 16 (see FIG. l)-continuous or intermittent-in said surfaces. Holes, of course, have no rotational directional axis, but grooves or slots would run at right angles to the direction of movement G of the airfoil section (see FIGS. 2, 3 and 6), that is, the passing of the air or fluid would be across the grooves or slots 16.
- the flow of air or gas should pass over the edge or lip 17 of the organ pipe configuration at an angle that will attain maximum conversion to the frequency of the organ pipe configuration, and this result can be obtained in airfoil sections without changing the airfoil characteristics by having the hole or slot at the proper angle to the air flow pattern 15.
- Open organ pipe configurations F' in FIG. 5 would be four times as long as the configurations F in FIG. 4, the latter showing a cavity, i.e., having a closed bottom.
- the waves or vibrations imparted to the fluids contacting with the airfoil section are below or above the limits of the human ear, i.e., in the range between 20 and 20,000 cycles per second, respectively.
- the method for preventing the formation of audible frequencies in fluids passing over an airfoil section comprising the conversion of potential audible frequencies into inaudible frequencies at the source of the fluid disturbance with the airfoil section, i.e., at the leading portion of said section, and in which the conversion is accomplished by providing organ pipe configurations in the surface of the airfoil surface that contacts the fluids, with the fluids passing over edges of the configurations to produce standing waves in the configurations that impart their frequencies to the fluids.
- the method for preventing the formation of audible frequencies in fluids passing over an airfoil section comprising the conversion of potential audible frequencies into inaudible frequencies at the source of the fluid disturbance with the airfoil section, i.e., at the lead portion of said section; and in which the conversion is accomplished by vibrating the surface of the airfoil section that contacts the fluids, with the vibrations imparting their frequencies to the fluids in the inaudible frequency range.
- An airfoil section movable through fluids and having a surface over which the fluids pass, the surface having means for converting potential audible frequencies into inaudible frequencies at the source of the fluid disturbance with the airfoil section, i.e., at the leading portion of said section, and in which the conversion is accomplished by organ pipe configurations in the surface of the airfoil section that contacts the fluids, with the fluids passing over edges of the configurations to produce standing waves in the configurations that impart their frequencies to the fluids.
- An airfoil section movable through fluids and having a surface over the fluids pass, the surface over the fluids pass, the surface having means for converting potential audible frequencies into inaudible frequencies at the source of fluid disturbance with the air foil section, i.e., at the leading portion of said section; and in which oscillators, or the like, are provided for vibrating the surface of the airfoil section that contacts the fluids, with the vibrations being in the inaudible frequency range.
Abstract
Means and method for preventing the formation of audible frequencies in fluids passing over an airfoil section in which the potential audible frequencies are converted into inaudible frequencies at the source of the fluid disturbance with the airfoil section.
Description
United States Patent Herbert A. Lebert 8 Corte Dorado, Millbrae, Calif. 94030 865,305
Oct. 10, 1969 Oct. 12, 1971 inventor Appl. No. Filed Patented MEANS AND METHOD FOR PREVENTING THE FORMATION OF AUDIBLE FREQUENCIES IN FLUIDS PASSING OVER AN AIRFOIL SECTION 8 Claims, 6 Drawing Figs.
U.S. Cl 244/35,
244/1 N Int. Cl B64c 3/04 Field of Search 244/35,
[5 6] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,899,150 8/1959 Ellis, Jr 244/130 X 3 ,467,348 9/1969 Lemelson 244/130 2,426,334 8/1947 Banning, Jr 244/41 Primary Examiner-Milton Buchler Assistant Examiner-C. A. Rutledge Attorney-Joseph F. Cole ABSTRACT: Means and method for preventing the formation of audible frequencies in fluids passing over an airfoil section in which the potential audible frequencies are converted into inaudible frequencies at the source of the fluid disturbance with the airfoil section.
WHEN IEU'UUII 219K OVE'MENT MOVEMENT WAVE LENGTH INVENTOR.
H ERBE'RT A. LE'BER'T l lZ WAvs LENGTH F :EI EFT. 3:-
ATTORNEY MEANS AND METHOD FOR PREVENTING THE FORMATION OF AUDIBLE FREQUENCIES IN FLUIDS PASSING OVER AN AIRFOIL SECTION SUMMARY As the cardinal object of this invention, it is proposed to provide means and method for preventing the formation of audible frequencies in fluids passing oven an airfoil section.
This is accomplished by the conversion of potential audible frequencies into inaudible frequencies at the source of fluid disturbance with the airfoil section.
More specifically stated, the conversion is accomplished by two different approaches: (1) providing organ pipe configurations in the surface of the airfoil section that contacts the.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING For a better understanding of the invention, reference should be made to the accompanying drawing, forming part of this specification, in which:
FIG. 1 is a fragmentary top plan view of an aircraft with organ pipe configurations formed therein;
FIG. 2 is a transverse sectional view taken through a wing of the aircraft along the plane 2-2 of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a transverse sectional view taken through an airfoil section defining a blade; 7
FIGS. 4 and 5 are diagrammatic views showing waves produced in a cavity and in a pipe, respectively; and
FIG. 6 is a section through an airfoil section in which oscillators, or the like, are used to vibrate the surface thereof that contacts the fluids.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Research work in the area of reducing noise created by turbulent gases, such as combustion gases moving at high velocity and at frequencies in the audible range, i.e. below 20,000 cycles per second, bypassing said gases over the lip 'of an organ pipe of such length as will create a frequency above 20,000 cycles per second, has resulted in an additional approach to the noise problem, whereby the conversion of the potential audible frequency takes place at the source of the gas or air disturbance, rather than converting the frequency of the gas from audible into inaudible as it leaves the engine and is entering the atmosphere.
To illustrate: While I have been able to convert the gases moving in the audible frequency range by passing them over the lip of a suitable organ pipe, as they are leaving the engine, I now propose that the organ pipe configuration be located at the source or point of fluid (gas or liquid) disturbance. This may be readily understood by referring to the accompanying drawing.
In FIG. 1, l show an aircraft designate generally at A having wings B projecting laterally from the fuselage C, with jet engines D arranged to advance the aircraft. As shown in FIG. 2, the wings B define airfoil sections. Also, in FIG. I, the tin l and rudder I1 define an airfoil section; and, likewise, the stabilizer l2 and elevator 13 define an airfoil section. In FIG. 3, a
blade E of the engine D has been disclosed, and it defines an airfoil section.
The source of fluid disturbance previously mentioned is usually an airfoil configuration or section, such as the intake compressor blades of the engine D; the power producing or high velocity gas deflecting blades; the leading edges 14 of the wings B and empennage (tail) surfaces in the case of speeds over Mach l,'or the speed of sound, thus resulting in sonic boom.
If such points of origin, or source of fluid disturbance, i.e., the surface of the airfoil section that contacts the air or gases (flow indicated by arrows 15 in FIGS. 2 and 6), is covered with suitable organ pipe configurations F, the fluid will be put into motion at frequencies imparted by the organ pipe configurations F, rather than being converted at a later time as in previous research on ultrasonic silencers for engines.
In order for any invention to be practical, the physical parameters of the proposed changes to existing components should be within engineering limits so b'rief reference will be made to what is needed in organ pipe sizes to obtain inaudible frequencies. Since the length of a closed organ pipe (see F IG. 4) isOne-quarter of the wave length generated by that pipe, and since the basic formula involved is L equals D over N, where L is wavelength and D is distance traveled by the sound in one second, and N is the number of vibrations per second, we can readily determine the length of pipe needed.
Keeping in mind that the speed of sound varies with the altitude-the range is 1,100 feet per second at sea level, or 760 miles per hour, and is 660 miles per hour at 30,000 feet elevation to give two points of reference-in order to obtain a frequency of 20,000 cycles per second, we need a closed organ pipe 0.165 inch deep at sea level and at 30,000 feet this depth becomes 0.144 inch. To get 30,000 cycles per second this pipe depth becomes 0.] 10 inch at sea level and 0.095 inch at 30,000 feet. For 40,000 cycles per second we need 0.082 inch and at 30,000 feet the figure is 0.072 inch. At still higher frequencies-l00,000 cycles per second is no longer considered high-the length or depth would be still shorter so we could readily, from a physical angle, install the equivalent of an organ pip configuration F in such airfoil sections (such as the wings B or blade E), or members as turbine intake or compressor blades; turbine exhaust or power blades; wing and empennage leading edge surfaces where the audible range waves known as sonic boom are formed.
These organ pipe configurations F can be in the form of small holes in the air contact surface of the blades E, or leading edge or the wind B or empennage (or for that matter any fluid disturbing surface), or they may be grooves or slots 16 (see FIG. l)-continuous or intermittent-in said surfaces. Holes, of course, have no rotational directional axis, but grooves or slots would run at right angles to the direction of movement G of the airfoil section (see FIGS. 2, 3 and 6), that is, the passing of the air or fluid would be across the grooves or slots 16.
Since an organ pipe works on the basis of a standing wave existing in the pipe (FIG. 5) or cavity (FIG. 4), we do not have air or gases going into 'and out of the pipe cavity. The standing wave does, however, impart its frequency to an air or gas passing over the lip 17 of the pipe opening. Hence there is no turbulence created to impair the efficiency of the airfoil section, or member involved. Strength of the air foil section, be it an engine blade or leading surface, need not be impaired since solid material often cannot disperse and attenuate strain forces as well as nonsolid members.
The flow of air or gas should pass over the edge or lip 17 of the organ pipe configuration at an angle that will attain maximum conversion to the frequency of the organ pipe configuration, and this result can be obtained in airfoil sections without changing the airfoil characteristics by having the hole or slot at the proper angle to the air flow pattern 15.
It should be pointed out that instead of having the inaudible frequencies generated by what might be termed self induced" action of the air or gases flowing over the organ pipe configurations F, as in FIGS. 1 to 5, inclusive, we can also attain the desired end result by causing the surface, over which the air flows in contact, to be vibrated in the inaudible section B become actuating diaphragms that impart their frequencies to the fluid (liquid or gas) that comes in contact with the diaphragms. At the inaudible frequencies, i.e., above 20,000 cycles per second, the movement of the metal involved is so small-due to the short wavelength-that the metal movement" is well within the elastic limits of the metal so fatigue is not a factor.
Also, the frequencies could be at the lower limits, i.e., below 20 cycles per second. Open organ pipe configurations F' in FIG. 5 would be four times as long as the configurations F in FIG. 4, the latter showing a cavity, i.e., having a closed bottom.
The waves or vibrations imparted to the fluids contacting with the airfoil section are below or above the limits of the human ear, i.e., in the range between 20 and 20,000 cycles per second, respectively.
I claim:
1. The method for preventing the formation of audible frequencies in fluids passing over an airfoil section comprising the conversion of potential audible frequencies into inaudible frequencies at the source of the fluid disturbance with the airfoil section, i.e., at the leading portion of said section, and in which the conversion is accomplished by providing organ pipe configurations in the surface of the airfoil surface that contacts the fluids, with the fluids passing over edges of the configurations to produce standing waves in the configurations that impart their frequencies to the fluids.
2. The method for preventing the formation of audible frequencies in fluids passing over an airfoil section, as set forth in claim 1; and in which the waves impart their frequencies below or above the limits of the human ear, i.e., in the range between 20 and 20,000 cycles per second, respectively.
3. The method for preventing the formation of audible frequencies in fluids passing over an airfoil section comprising the conversion of potential audible frequencies into inaudible frequencies at the source of the fluid disturbance with the airfoil section, i.e., at the lead portion of said section; and in which the conversion is accomplished by vibrating the surface of the airfoil section that contacts the fluids, with the vibrations imparting their frequencies to the fluids in the inaudible frequency range.
4. The method for preventing the formation of audible frequencies in fluids passing over an airfoil section, as set forth in claim 3; and in which the vibrations are below or above the limits of the human ear, i.e., in the range between 20 and 20,000 cycles per second, respectively.
5. An airfoil section movable through fluids and having a surface over which the fluids pass, the surface having means for converting potential audible frequencies into inaudible frequencies at the source of the fluid disturbance with the airfoil section, i.e., at the leading portion of said section, and in which the conversion is accomplished by organ pipe configurations in the surface of the airfoil section that contacts the fluids, with the fluids passing over edges of the configurations to produce standing waves in the configurations that impart their frequencies to the fluids.
6. The combination, as set forth in claim 5; and in which the waves impart their frequencies below or above the limits of the human ear, i.e., in the range between 20 and 20,000 cycles per second, respectively.
7. An airfoil section movable through fluids and having a surface over the fluids pass, the surface over the fluids pass, the surface having means for converting potential audible frequencies into inaudible frequencies at the source of fluid disturbance with the air foil section, i.e., at the leading portion of said section; and in which oscillators, or the like, are provided for vibrating the surface of the airfoil section that contacts the fluids, with the vibrations being in the inaudible frequency range.
8. The combination, as set forth in claim 7; and in which the vibrations impart their frequencies below or above the limits of the human ear, i.e., in the range between 20 and 20,000 cycles per second, respectively.
32 3 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No. 3,612,446 Dated October 12, 1971 lnventofls) Herbert A. Lebert It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent are hereby corrected as shown below:
[- Oblumn 2, line 41, "wind" should read --wing-. .1
Column 4, line 25, delete "the surface over the fluids pass,".
Signed and sealed this +th day of April 1972.
(SEAL) Attest:
ROBERT GOTTSCHALK EDWARD M.FLETCHER,JR.
Commissioner of Patents Attesting Officer
Claims (8)
1. The method for preventing the formation of audible frequencies in fluids passing over an airfoil section comprising the conversion of potential audible frequencies into inaudible frequencies at the source of the fluid disturbance with the airfoil section, i.e., at the leading portion of said section, and in which the conversion is accomplished by providing organ pipe configurations in the surface of the airfoil surface that contacts the fluids, with the fluids passing over edges of the configurations to produce standing waves in the configurations that impart their frequencies to the fluids.
2. The method for preventing the formation of audible frequencies in fluids passing over an airfoil section, as set forth in claim 1; and in which the waves impart their frequencies below or above the limits of the human ear, i.e., in the range between 20 and 20,000 cycles per second, respectively.
3. The method for preventing the formation of audible frequencies in fluids passing over an airfoil section comprising the conversion of potential audible frequencies into inaudible frequencies at the source of the fluid disturbance with the airfoil section, i.e., at the lead portion of said section; and in which the conversion is accomplished by vibrating the surface of the airfoil section that contacts the fluids, with the vibrations imparting their frequencies to the fluids in the inaudible frequency range.
4. The method for preventing the formation of audible frequencies in fluids passing over an airfoil section, as set forth in claim 3; and in which the vibrations are below or above the limits of the human ear, i.e., in the range between 20 and 20,000 cycles per second, respectively.
5. An airfoil section movable through fluids and having a surface over which the fluids pass, the surface having means for converting potential audible frequencies into inaudible frequencies at the source of the fluid disturbance with the airfoil section, i.e., at the leading portion of said section, and in which the conversion is accomplished by organ pipe configurations in the surface of the airfoil section that contacts the fluids, with tHe fluids passing over edges of the configurations to produce standing waves in the configurations that impart their frequencies to the fluids.
6. The combination, as set forth in claim 5; and in which the waves impart their frequencies below or above the limits of the human ear, i.e., in the range between 20 and 20,000 cycles per second, respectively.
7. An airfoil section movable through fluids and having a surface over the fluids pass, the surface over the fluids pass, the surface having means for converting potential audible frequencies into inaudible frequencies at the source of fluid disturbance with the air foil section, i.e., at the leading portion of said section; and in which oscillators, or the like, are provided for vibrating the surface of the airfoil section that contacts the fluids, with the vibrations being in the inaudible frequency range.
8. The combination, as set forth in claim 7; and in which the vibrations impart their frequencies below or above the limits of the human ear, i.e., in the range between 20 and 20,000 cycles per second, respectively.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US86530569A | 1969-10-10 | 1969-10-10 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US3612446A true US3612446A (en) | 1971-10-12 |
Family
ID=25345189
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US865305A Expired - Lifetime US3612446A (en) | 1969-10-10 | 1969-10-10 | Means and method for preventing the formation of audible frequencies in fluids passing over an airfoil section |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US3612446A (en) |
Cited By (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3904151A (en) * | 1973-03-16 | 1975-09-09 | Vehicle Research Corp | Supersonic upflow wing |
US4872484A (en) * | 1988-12-12 | 1989-10-10 | John Hickey | System for controlling the flow of a fluid medium relative to an object |
US4974633A (en) * | 1989-12-19 | 1990-12-04 | Hickey John J | System for controlling the flow of a fluid medium relative to an object |
WO1991003623A1 (en) * | 1989-08-31 | 1991-03-21 | Technology Integration And Development Group Incorporated | System and method for suppressing noise produced by rotors |
US5075564A (en) * | 1989-12-19 | 1991-12-24 | Hickey John J | Combined solar and wind powered generator with spiral surface pattern |
US5254876A (en) * | 1992-05-28 | 1993-10-19 | Hickey John J | Combined solar and wind powered generator with spiral blades |
US5540406A (en) * | 1993-10-25 | 1996-07-30 | Occhipinti; Anthony C. | Hydrofoils and airfoils |
US5823467A (en) * | 1997-04-01 | 1998-10-20 | Mcdonnell Douglas Corp | Passive damping wedge |
US5901928A (en) * | 1996-06-14 | 1999-05-11 | Aptek, Inc. | Active turbulence control technique for drag reduction |
US6276636B1 (en) * | 2000-01-14 | 2001-08-21 | Norman W. Krastel | Gas or fluid de-organizers for moving objects |
US6471157B1 (en) * | 1999-03-22 | 2002-10-29 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Device and method for reducing aircraft noise |
US20050194206A1 (en) * | 2004-03-03 | 2005-09-08 | Marco Rose | Arrangement for the generation of sonic fields of a specific modal composition |
US20050199766A1 (en) * | 2003-06-11 | 2005-09-15 | Knott David S. | Propulsion arrangement |
US20090206207A1 (en) * | 2005-04-18 | 2009-08-20 | Scott Rethorst | Supersonic aircraft footprint spreading control system and method |
US20130313355A1 (en) * | 2012-05-22 | 2013-11-28 | Eurocopter | Pitching stabilization means and a rotary wing aircraft including such means |
US8695915B1 (en) * | 2011-03-11 | 2014-04-15 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Flap side edge liners for airframe noise reduction |
US20140255205A1 (en) * | 2008-11-01 | 2014-09-11 | Alexander J. Shelman-Cohen | Reduced Drag System for Windmills, Fans, Propellers, Airfoils and Hydrofoils |
US20150246726A1 (en) * | 2014-02-28 | 2015-09-03 | Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH | Rotorcraft with at least one main rotor and at least one counter-torque rotor |
US9132909B1 (en) | 2011-03-11 | 2015-09-15 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Flap edge noise reduction fins |
US20150259060A1 (en) * | 2011-03-11 | 2015-09-17 | U.S.A. As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Reactive Orthotropic Lattice Diffuser for Noise Reduction |
US20160107746A1 (en) * | 2014-10-16 | 2016-04-21 | Rohr, Inc. | Perforated surface for suction-type laminar flow control |
JP2017534808A (en) * | 2014-11-25 | 2017-11-24 | レミ ラフォレストLAFOREST, Remi | Profile element for generating force |
US20180148163A1 (en) * | 2016-11-30 | 2018-05-31 | Airbus Defence and Space GmbH | Control surface component for a high-lift device of an aircraft and production method therefor |
US10099771B2 (en) * | 2016-03-14 | 2018-10-16 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft wing structure and associated method for addressing lift and drag |
US10352171B2 (en) | 2008-11-01 | 2019-07-16 | Alexander J. Shelman-Cohen | Reduced drag system for windmills, fans, propellers, airfoils, and hydrofoils |
US10399662B2 (en) * | 2016-08-30 | 2019-09-03 | Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation | Aircraft with cabin acoustic systems having quarter wavelength absorbers |
US11433990B2 (en) | 2018-07-09 | 2022-09-06 | Rohr, Inc. | Active laminar flow control system with composite panel |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2426334A (en) * | 1943-10-15 | 1947-08-26 | Jr Thomas A Banning | Wing for airplanes and the like |
US2899150A (en) * | 1959-08-11 | Bound vortex skin | ||
US3467348A (en) * | 1967-10-10 | 1969-09-16 | Jerome H Lemelson | Aircraft structures and systems |
-
1969
- 1969-10-10 US US865305A patent/US3612446A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2899150A (en) * | 1959-08-11 | Bound vortex skin | ||
US2426334A (en) * | 1943-10-15 | 1947-08-26 | Jr Thomas A Banning | Wing for airplanes and the like |
US3467348A (en) * | 1967-10-10 | 1969-09-16 | Jerome H Lemelson | Aircraft structures and systems |
Cited By (36)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3904151A (en) * | 1973-03-16 | 1975-09-09 | Vehicle Research Corp | Supersonic upflow wing |
US4872484A (en) * | 1988-12-12 | 1989-10-10 | John Hickey | System for controlling the flow of a fluid medium relative to an object |
WO1991003623A1 (en) * | 1989-08-31 | 1991-03-21 | Technology Integration And Development Group Incorporated | System and method for suppressing noise produced by rotors |
US5217349A (en) * | 1989-08-31 | 1993-06-08 | Technology Integration Incorporated | System and method for suppressing noise produced by rotors |
US4974633A (en) * | 1989-12-19 | 1990-12-04 | Hickey John J | System for controlling the flow of a fluid medium relative to an object |
US5075564A (en) * | 1989-12-19 | 1991-12-24 | Hickey John J | Combined solar and wind powered generator with spiral surface pattern |
US5254876A (en) * | 1992-05-28 | 1993-10-19 | Hickey John J | Combined solar and wind powered generator with spiral blades |
US5540406A (en) * | 1993-10-25 | 1996-07-30 | Occhipinti; Anthony C. | Hydrofoils and airfoils |
US5901928A (en) * | 1996-06-14 | 1999-05-11 | Aptek, Inc. | Active turbulence control technique for drag reduction |
US5823467A (en) * | 1997-04-01 | 1998-10-20 | Mcdonnell Douglas Corp | Passive damping wedge |
US6471157B1 (en) * | 1999-03-22 | 2002-10-29 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Device and method for reducing aircraft noise |
US6276636B1 (en) * | 2000-01-14 | 2001-08-21 | Norman W. Krastel | Gas or fluid de-organizers for moving objects |
US20050199766A1 (en) * | 2003-06-11 | 2005-09-15 | Knott David S. | Propulsion arrangement |
US7364118B2 (en) * | 2003-06-11 | 2008-04-29 | Rolls-Royce Plc | Propulsion arrangement |
US20050194206A1 (en) * | 2004-03-03 | 2005-09-08 | Marco Rose | Arrangement for the generation of sonic fields of a specific modal composition |
US7516815B2 (en) * | 2004-03-03 | 2009-04-14 | Roll-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co Kg | Arrangement for the generation of sonic fields of a specific modal composition |
US20090206207A1 (en) * | 2005-04-18 | 2009-08-20 | Scott Rethorst | Supersonic aircraft footprint spreading control system and method |
US7861966B2 (en) | 2005-04-18 | 2011-01-04 | Vehicle Research Corporation | Supersonic aircraft footprint spreading control system and method |
US10352171B2 (en) | 2008-11-01 | 2019-07-16 | Alexander J. Shelman-Cohen | Reduced drag system for windmills, fans, propellers, airfoils, and hydrofoils |
US10001015B2 (en) * | 2008-11-01 | 2018-06-19 | Alexander J. Shelman-Cohen | Drag reduction systems having fractal geometry/geometrics |
US20140255205A1 (en) * | 2008-11-01 | 2014-09-11 | Alexander J. Shelman-Cohen | Reduced Drag System for Windmills, Fans, Propellers, Airfoils and Hydrofoils |
US9623952B1 (en) | 2011-03-11 | 2017-04-18 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | External acoustic liners for multi-functional aircraft noise reduction |
US8695915B1 (en) * | 2011-03-11 | 2014-04-15 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Flap side edge liners for airframe noise reduction |
US20150259060A1 (en) * | 2011-03-11 | 2015-09-17 | U.S.A. As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Reactive Orthotropic Lattice Diffuser for Noise Reduction |
US9227719B2 (en) * | 2011-03-11 | 2016-01-05 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Reactive orthotropic lattice diffuser for noise reduction |
US9132909B1 (en) | 2011-03-11 | 2015-09-15 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Flap edge noise reduction fins |
US9302762B2 (en) * | 2012-05-22 | 2016-04-05 | Airbus Helicopters | Pitching stabilization means and a rotary wing aircraft including such means |
US20130313355A1 (en) * | 2012-05-22 | 2013-11-28 | Eurocopter | Pitching stabilization means and a rotary wing aircraft including such means |
US20150246726A1 (en) * | 2014-02-28 | 2015-09-03 | Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH | Rotorcraft with at least one main rotor and at least one counter-torque rotor |
US10000277B2 (en) * | 2014-10-16 | 2018-06-19 | Rohr, Inc. | Perforated surface for suction-type laminar flow control |
US20160107746A1 (en) * | 2014-10-16 | 2016-04-21 | Rohr, Inc. | Perforated surface for suction-type laminar flow control |
JP2017534808A (en) * | 2014-11-25 | 2017-11-24 | レミ ラフォレストLAFOREST, Remi | Profile element for generating force |
US10099771B2 (en) * | 2016-03-14 | 2018-10-16 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft wing structure and associated method for addressing lift and drag |
US10399662B2 (en) * | 2016-08-30 | 2019-09-03 | Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation | Aircraft with cabin acoustic systems having quarter wavelength absorbers |
US20180148163A1 (en) * | 2016-11-30 | 2018-05-31 | Airbus Defence and Space GmbH | Control surface component for a high-lift device of an aircraft and production method therefor |
US11433990B2 (en) | 2018-07-09 | 2022-09-06 | Rohr, Inc. | Active laminar flow control system with composite panel |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US3612446A (en) | Means and method for preventing the formation of audible frequencies in fluids passing over an airfoil section | |
Hersh et al. | Investigation of acoustic effects of leading-edge serrations on airfoils | |
US4046336A (en) | Vortex diffusion and dissipation | |
US4522360A (en) | Passive drag control of airfoils at transonic speeds | |
US2558816A (en) | Fluid mixing device | |
US3779338A (en) | Method of reducing sound generation in fluid flow systems embodying foil structures and the like | |
JPH1159594A (en) | Airfoil having stall suppressing function due to forcing vibration | |
Amitay et al. | Aerodynamic flow control using synthetic jet actuators | |
CN108150348B (en) | A kind of blade of vertical axis wind turbine component and its synthesizing jet-flow control method | |
US3647160A (en) | Method and apparatus for reducing sonic booms | |
Davidson et al. | Helicopter noise | |
Pagliaroli et al. | Aeroacoustic Study of small scale Rotors for mini Drone Propulsion: Serrated Trailing Edge Effect. | |
US4582276A (en) | Lifting shock wave cancellation module | |
Rice et al. | Control of shear flows by artificial excitation | |
Caruana et al. | Buffeting active control in transonic flow | |
Lilley | Aerodynamic noise | |
Viets et al. | Unsteady wing boundary layer energization | |
Raghunathan et al. | A thick symmetrical aerofoil oscillating about zero incidence angle | |
Bolvashenkov et al. | Novel Principle of Aero/Hydro-Dynamic Lift Creation, Methods of Its Technical Implementation, and Prospects of Its Application | |
Mat et al. | Effects of Synthetic Jet Actuator (SJA) on flow topology of blunt-edged UTM VFE2 wing model | |
Fink | Mechanisms of externally blown flap noise | |
Caruana et al. | BST and buffeting active control with a flap actuator | |
White Jr | The status of rotor noise technology: One man's opinion | |
Yon et al. | Cellular structures in the flow over the flap of a two-element wing | |
Kiya et al. | Interaction between vortex rings and a separated shear layer: Towards active control of separation zones |