US20170305528A1 - Aircraft comprising a casing for a lifting aid - Google Patents

Aircraft comprising a casing for a lifting aid Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20170305528A1
US20170305528A1 US15/587,902 US201715587902A US2017305528A1 US 20170305528 A1 US20170305528 A1 US 20170305528A1 US 201715587902 A US201715587902 A US 201715587902A US 2017305528 A1 US2017305528 A1 US 2017305528A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
aircraft
strake
casing
jet
edge
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US15/587,902
Inventor
Rolf Emunds
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Airbus Operations GmbH
Original Assignee
Airbus Operations GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Airbus Operations GmbH filed Critical Airbus Operations GmbH
Priority to US15/587,902 priority Critical patent/US20170305528A1/en
Assigned to AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH reassignment AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: EMUNDS, ROLF
Publication of US20170305528A1 publication Critical patent/US20170305528A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C7/00Structures or fairings not otherwise provided for
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C9/00Adjustable control surfaces or members, e.g. rudders
    • B64C9/02Mounting or supporting thereof
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C9/00Adjustable control surfaces or members, e.g. rudders
    • B64C9/14Adjustable control surfaces or members, e.g. rudders forming slots
    • B64C9/16Adjustable control surfaces or members, e.g. rudders forming slots at the rear of the wing
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C23/00Influencing air flow over aircraft surfaces, not otherwise provided for
    • B64C23/06Influencing air flow over aircraft surfaces, not otherwise provided for by generating vortices

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a casing for a lifting aid for an aircraft, in particular for a flap track of an aircraft.
  • the invention further relates to an aircraft with a lifting aid and a casing of this type.
  • Aircraft of this type generally comprise so-called “landing flaps” which can be extended during the take-off and landing phases to provide increased aerodynamic lift at slow flight speeds.
  • the landing flaps are usually arranged in the flap tracks on the underside of the aerofoils.
  • the flap tracks are enclosed by corresponding aerodynamically optimized casings which can in addition be configured to produce aerodynamic lift.
  • undesirable vibrations of the flap track casing can, however, occur owing to the effect of the propulsive jet of an engine.
  • particular operating states of the aircraft can promote the occurrence of vibrations, for example if the aircraft is still on the ground during maximum thrust or accelerates while still on the runway.
  • the vibrations can lead to damage, for example hairline cracks in the flap track casing or supports thereof, to the point of a complete breakdown of the structure in the pivot region.
  • a strake which projects from an outer surface of the casing and extends substantially in the direction of flight.
  • a strake is to be understood here as a planar (surface-optimized) structure such as a plate or plank.
  • the strake projects from the outer surface of the casing and extends substantially in the direction of flight of the aircraft, the strake obstructs aerodynamic fluxes on the outer surface of the casing which comprise significant flux components perpendicular to the direction of flight. In this way, if the casing dips into the propulsive jet, for example during the take-off phase, the formation of unstable, oscillating vortex systems due to flux components of this type are suppressed and a stable aerodynamic flux is produced and flows around the casing. Because of the presence of oscillating vortex systems, no significant oscillating pressure variations and therefore no forces causing damaging vibrations occur on the outer surface of the casing.
  • the strake projects substantially vertically from the outer surface. Flux components extending transverse to the strake are thus particularly effectively obstructed on both sides.
  • the strake forms an angle of between 0° and 40° with a vertically downward direction. This has the effect that in the case of oncoming flow, a transverse force is applied which displays no zero passages, so that the casing and strake are particularly gently loaded in only one direction.
  • the strake has a length of from 1 m to 3 m along the outer surface of the casing. A strake of this length adequately stabilizes the aerodynamic flux in the case of low inherent weight.
  • the strake comprises a leading edge on its front end and/or a trailing edge on its back end, which extend perpendicular to the outer surface of the casing. This produces a controlled oncoming flow of the leading edge or a controlled stall of the trailing edge.
  • the strake has a lower height at its front end than at its back end.
  • the height of the strake at its front end is preferably 1 cm or less, so that the formation of vortices on the leading edge is eliminated.
  • the strake has a height of 15 cm or less at its back end.
  • a strake of this height stabilizes the aerodynamic flux adequately in the case of sufficient inherent stability and low inherent weight.
  • the strake has a maximum height at a position at a distance from its front and back ends.
  • the strake has a thickness between 2 mm and 5 mm. This enables a high stability of the strake in the case of low weight.
  • the strake preferably has a substantially rectangular transverse profile. This enables a controlled stall on the upper edge.
  • the invention provides an aircraft with a lifting aid which comprises a casing of this type.
  • the aircraft preferably comprises a propulsive jet that is arranged in such a way that during the operating phase of the aircraft, the casing at least partially dips into a jet of the jet engine.
  • jet engines and lifting aids can be optimized in their position without constructive restrictions and without the occurrence of damage to the casing.
  • the strake is formed on one of the sides of the casing which faces the jet.
  • the strake thus works particularly efficiently, directly at the location of the direct oncoming flow via the propulsive jet.
  • FIGS. 1A-B are sectional views in the direction of flight of an aircraft aerofoil having a casing in accordance with two embodiments of the invention
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic perspective view of a strake of a casing in accordance with an embodiment
  • FIG. 3 shows simulated function curves of pressure distributions on strakes of casings in accordance with different embodiments
  • FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a back portion of a casing in accordance with an embodiment, with simulated flow
  • FIG. 5 is a bottom view of the portion of the casing from FIG. 4 , with simulated flow;
  • FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a back portion of a conventional casing, with simulated flow.
  • FIG. 7 is a bottom view of the portion of the casing from FIG. 6 , with simulated flow.
  • FIG. 1A is in a schematic rear view of a portion of an aerofoil 402 of a jet-driven commercial aircraft 118 , which aerofoil is fixed on a fuselage 120 of the aircraft 118 .
  • the viewing direction of the viewer corresponds to the direction of flight of the aircraft 118 .
  • the aerofoil 402 On its trailing edge 404 which is facing the viewer, the aerofoil 402 comprises landing flaps 400 , 401 which are supported so as to be retractable from a flap track as a lifting aid.
  • the flap track itself is enclosed by a casing 100 and is not shown in the drawing of FIG. 1A .
  • the flap track casing 100 extends substantially in the direction of flight along a portion of the underside of the aerofoil 402 , in the present case, for example, from approximately the centre of the aerofoil 402 as far as its trailing edge 404 or marginally beyond this.
  • an engine mount 116 is fixed on the underside of the aerofoil 402 near the flap track casing 100 , and holds a jet engine 112 of the aircraft 118 .
  • the jet engine 112 produces a propulsive jet 114 counter to the direction of flight, the cross-section and direction of which depend on the operating state of the aircraft 118 .
  • the dashed line in FIG. 1A marks highly schematically a cross-section of the propulsive jet 114 in the region of the trailing edge 404 of the aerofoil during operation of the jet engine 112 on the ground, for example when it is not moving, or during acceleration on the ground during take-off.
  • the propulsive jet 114 is deflected outwards under the effect of the ground, the landing flap casing 100 dipping partially into the propulsive jet 114 , and to a greater extent when the casing 100 of the flap track is lowered further towards the bottom than shown, in order to extend the landing flaps 400 , 401 .
  • the flap track casing 100 is arranged at substantially the same distance from the aircraft fuselage 120 as the engine mount 116 , purely by way of example.
  • the engine mount 116 can, for example, comprise an engine mount casing which transitions into the casing 100 of the flap track.
  • FIG. 1B shows an alternative embodiment in which, by way of example, the flap track casing 100 is arranged offset in relation to the engine mount 116 in the direction of the internal side of the board, that is to say towards the fuselage 120 . It is assumed here that the flap track casing 100 and the engine mount 116 are offset at a distance in this way so that during operation of the jet engine 112 on the ground and outward deflection of the jet 114 due to the divergence of the jet 114 from the external side of the board, the propulsive jet 114 encounters the casing 100 .
  • a strake is fixed on the outer surface 106 of the flap track casing 100 on the side facing the jet 114 , meaning in this case on the external side of the board.
  • FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a back portion of a flap track casing 100 in accordance with a further embodiment which is based on the casing of the furthest outside located flap track of the Airbus A380.
  • the outermost engine is arranged at an equal distance from the aircraft fuselage and the flap track casing 100 shown.
  • the landing flap 400 is shown in a lowered position, in which the casing 100 dips into the propulsive jet of the engine during operation thereof.
  • flux lines 410 are shown in FIG. 4 , which have been numerically calculated by a hybrid Navier-Stokes method common in fluid mechanics, in order to simulate the aerodynamic flux around the casing 100 in the position shown, upon full thrust of the engine on the ground.
  • a first group 414 of flux lines indicates a flow on the bottom wall of the casing 100 , which flow is orientated substantially along the strake 104 in the direction of flight as far as the back end 406 of the casing 100 .
  • a second group 412 of flux lines indicates a flow on the board internal side wall of the casing 100 , which flow is also directed substantially along the strake 104 in the direction of flight as far as the back end 406 of the casing 100 where it combines with the flow of the first group 414 .
  • the flow shown produces an initial stress of the casing 100 directed towards the internal side of the board (to the viewer), which, irrespective of the existence of oscillations, prevents the material of the casing 100 from being loaded alternately in compression and tension, and thus prevents material fatigue.
  • FIG. 5 is a bottom view of the portion of the casing from FIG. 4 with the simulated flow of the simulation from FIG. 4 .
  • the curve of the strake can clearly be recognised, the trailing edge 206 of which at its back end 204 is higher than the leading edge at the front end 200 of the same strake.
  • FIGS. 6 and 7 show for comparison a back portion of a conventional landing flap casing, with simulated flow according to the same method as in FIGS. 4 and 5 .
  • the configuration shown corresponds to the conventional casing of the outermost flap tracks of the Airbus A380.
  • the first group 414 of flux lines which flows along the bottom wall of the casing, comprises a considerable number of flux lines with components orientated upwards in the direction of the side wall of the casing 100 .
  • the second group 412 of flux lines which flows along the casing 100 on the side wall also comprises a considerable number of flux lines with components orientated downwards towards the floor wall.
  • the flux fields formed by the first group 414 and second group 412 meet in the region of the radius of the casing 100 , which radius is inside the board, to form an unstable vortex system which, according to the given local distribution of compression, hunts around the radius which connects the floor and side wall of the casing 100 .
  • the unstable vortex system leads to an oscillating pressure distribution on the upper surface of the casing, which distribution causes material-damaging vibrations.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic perspective view of a strake of a casing according to an embodiment, for example the embodiment from FIG. 1 .
  • the strake 104 has a rectangular cross-sectional profile of thickness D and a rectangular upper edge 208 .
  • a lower edge 210 is fit to the contour curve of the outer surface of the flap track casing.
  • the strake begins with a leading edge 202 substantially perpendicular to the outer surface of the casing, which edge is of height H 1 , extends along the upper edge 208 over its length in the form of a spline which reaches a maximum height H 3 in a position at a distance from both ends, and finishes at the back end 204 of the strake with a trailing edge which is also substantially vertical on the outer surface of the casing 100 and has the height H 2 .
  • FIG. 3 shows simulated function curves of pressure distributions on differently formed strakes which all correspond to the basic form described by means of FIG. 2 , assuming that the thickness D is always 3 mm, the height H 1 is always 1 cm, and the height H 2 is always 15 cm. In each case, the simulation is based on a configuration such as those shown in FIGS. 4 to 7 , irrespective of the form of the strake.
  • each curve shows the pressure distributions on the strake at the respective longitudinal coordinates, the atmospheric pressure 300 having been marked separately on the bottom.
  • a strake of this type can, for example, be produced from a composite material and connected to the outer wall of the casing by means of fastening elements integrated into this wall.
  • the invention can also be applied to types of lifting aids other than flap track casings, as well as to actual loads, inter alia, which are mounted underneath the aerofoils or in other places which are accessible to the propulsive jet of a jet engine.

Abstract

An aircraft comprising a casing for a lifting aid, the casing comprising at least one strake which extends essentially in a protruding manner in the direction of flight in relation to an outer surface of the casing.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/293,570 filed Nov. 10, 2011, which claims priority to PCT/EP2010/056374 filed May 10, 2010 which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/177,831, and German Patent Application No. 10 2009 003 084.0, filed May 13, 2009, the entire disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a casing for a lifting aid for an aircraft, in particular for a flap track of an aircraft. The invention further relates to an aircraft with a lifting aid and a casing of this type.
  • Although applicable to any aircraft or spacecraft casings, the present invention and the problem on which it is based will be explained in greater detail with reference to flap track casings of jet engine commercial aircraft.
  • Aircraft of this type generally comprise so-called “landing flaps” which can be extended during the take-off and landing phases to provide increased aerodynamic lift at slow flight speeds. For this purpose, the landing flaps are usually arranged in the flap tracks on the underside of the aerofoils. In order to keep air resistance as low as possible at full cruising speed, the flap tracks are enclosed by corresponding aerodynamically optimized casings which can in addition be configured to produce aerodynamic lift.
  • In particular in the case of aircraft with jet engines located on the underside of the aerofoils, undesirable vibrations of the flap track casing can, however, occur owing to the effect of the propulsive jet of an engine. Along with spatial closeness of the engine and flap track casing, particular operating states of the aircraft can promote the occurrence of vibrations, for example if the aircraft is still on the ground during maximum thrust or accelerates while still on the runway. The vibrations can lead to damage, for example hairline cracks in the flap track casing or supports thereof, to the point of a complete breakdown of the structure in the pivot region.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It is therefore an object of the present invention to eliminate damaging effects of the propulsive jets on casings of lifting aids such as flap tracks.
  • The idea behind the present invention involves forming at least one strake which projects from an outer surface of the casing and extends substantially in the direction of flight. A strake is to be understood here as a planar (surface-optimized) structure such as a plate or plank.
  • Because the strake projects from the outer surface of the casing and extends substantially in the direction of flight of the aircraft, the strake obstructs aerodynamic fluxes on the outer surface of the casing which comprise significant flux components perpendicular to the direction of flight. In this way, if the casing dips into the propulsive jet, for example during the take-off phase, the formation of unstable, oscillating vortex systems due to flux components of this type are suppressed and a stable aerodynamic flux is produced and flows around the casing. Because of the presence of oscillating vortex systems, no significant oscillating pressure variations and therefore no forces causing damaging vibrations occur on the outer surface of the casing.
  • According to a preferred development, the strake projects substantially vertically from the outer surface. Flux components extending transverse to the strake are thus particularly effectively obstructed on both sides.
  • According to a preferred development, the strake forms an angle of between 0° and 40° with a vertically downward direction. This has the effect that in the case of oncoming flow, a transverse force is applied which displays no zero passages, so that the casing and strake are particularly gently loaded in only one direction.
  • According to a preferred development, the strake has a length of from 1 m to 3 m along the outer surface of the casing. A strake of this length adequately stabilizes the aerodynamic flux in the case of low inherent weight.
  • According to a preferred development, the strake comprises a leading edge on its front end and/or a trailing edge on its back end, which extend perpendicular to the outer surface of the casing. This produces a controlled oncoming flow of the leading edge or a controlled stall of the trailing edge.
  • According to a preferred development, the strake has a lower height at its front end than at its back end. The height of the strake at its front end is preferably 1 cm or less, so that the formation of vortices on the leading edge is eliminated.
  • According to a preferred development, the strake has a height of 15 cm or less at its back end. A strake of this height stabilizes the aerodynamic flux adequately in the case of sufficient inherent stability and low inherent weight. Preferably, the strake has a maximum height at a position at a distance from its front and back ends.
  • According to a preferred development, the strake has a thickness between 2 mm and 5 mm. This enables a high stability of the strake in the case of low weight. The strake preferably has a substantially rectangular transverse profile. This enables a controlled stall on the upper edge.
  • According to a preferred development, the invention provides an aircraft with a lifting aid which comprises a casing of this type. The aircraft preferably comprises a propulsive jet that is arranged in such a way that during the operating phase of the aircraft, the casing at least partially dips into a jet of the jet engine. In this way, jet engines and lifting aids can be optimized in their position without constructive restrictions and without the occurrence of damage to the casing.
  • According to a preferred development, the strake is formed on one of the sides of the casing which faces the jet. The strake thus works particularly efficiently, directly at the location of the direct oncoming flow via the propulsive jet.
  • The invention will be further explained using embodiments with reference to the accompanying figures.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • In the figures:
  • FIGS. 1A-B are sectional views in the direction of flight of an aircraft aerofoil having a casing in accordance with two embodiments of the invention;
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic perspective view of a strake of a casing in accordance with an embodiment;
  • FIG. 3 shows simulated function curves of pressure distributions on strakes of casings in accordance with different embodiments;
  • FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a back portion of a casing in accordance with an embodiment, with simulated flow;
  • FIG. 5 is a bottom view of the portion of the casing from FIG. 4, with simulated flow;
  • FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a back portion of a conventional casing, with simulated flow; and
  • FIG. 7 is a bottom view of the portion of the casing from FIG. 6, with simulated flow.
  • DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS
  • In the figures, the same reference numerals denote identical or functionally identical components, unless indicated otherwise.
  • FIG. 1A is in a schematic rear view of a portion of an aerofoil 402 of a jet-driven commercial aircraft 118, which aerofoil is fixed on a fuselage 120 of the aircraft 118. The viewing direction of the viewer corresponds to the direction of flight of the aircraft 118. On its trailing edge 404 which is facing the viewer, the aerofoil 402 comprises landing flaps 400, 401 which are supported so as to be retractable from a flap track as a lifting aid. The flap track itself is enclosed by a casing 100 and is not shown in the drawing of FIG. 1A. The flap track casing 100 extends substantially in the direction of flight along a portion of the underside of the aerofoil 402, in the present case, for example, from approximately the centre of the aerofoil 402 as far as its trailing edge 404 or marginally beyond this.
  • Likewise, an engine mount 116 is fixed on the underside of the aerofoil 402 near the flap track casing 100, and holds a jet engine 112 of the aircraft 118. During operation the jet engine 112 produces a propulsive jet 114 counter to the direction of flight, the cross-section and direction of which depend on the operating state of the aircraft 118. The dashed line in FIG. 1A marks highly schematically a cross-section of the propulsive jet 114 in the region of the trailing edge 404 of the aerofoil during operation of the jet engine 112 on the ground, for example when it is not moving, or during acceleration on the ground during take-off. In this operating state, the propulsive jet 114 is deflected outwards under the effect of the ground, the landing flap casing 100 dipping partially into the propulsive jet 114, and to a greater extent when the casing 100 of the flap track is lowered further towards the bottom than shown, in order to extend the landing flaps 400, 401.
  • In the present embodiment the flap track casing 100 is arranged at substantially the same distance from the aircraft fuselage 120 as the engine mount 116, purely by way of example. The engine mount 116 can, for example, comprise an engine mount casing which transitions into the casing 100 of the flap track.
  • On the outer surface 106 of the flap track casing 100 a strake 104 is fixed on the side facing the jet 114, meaning in this case on the internal side of the board, the outwardly deflected jet of which encounters the casing 100, which strake extends along the outer surface 106 of the casing 100 in the direction of flight and finishes in an approximately vertical trailing edge on the outer surface 106 at its end which is turned towards the viewer. The strake 104 extends in a plane which forms an angle γ of approximately 40° with the vertically downward direction 108 and is substantially vertical on the outer surface 106 of the casing. With respect to a longitudinal axis 122 of the casing 100, the plane of the strake 104 extends substantially radially.
  • FIG. 1B shows an alternative embodiment in which, by way of example, the flap track casing 100 is arranged offset in relation to the engine mount 116 in the direction of the internal side of the board, that is to say towards the fuselage 120. It is assumed here that the flap track casing 100 and the engine mount 116 are offset at a distance in this way so that during operation of the jet engine 112 on the ground and outward deflection of the jet 114 due to the divergence of the jet 114 from the external side of the board, the propulsive jet 114 encounters the casing 100. A strake is fixed on the outer surface 106 of the flap track casing 100 on the side facing the jet 114, meaning in this case on the external side of the board.
  • FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a back portion of a flap track casing 100 in accordance with a further embodiment which is based on the casing of the furthest outside located flap track of the Airbus A380. In this type of aircraft, the outermost engine is arranged at an equal distance from the aircraft fuselage and the flap track casing 100 shown. A strake 104 has been attached to the internal side of the board, seen by the viewer of FIG. 4, which strake extends over a length of 3 m along the outer wall 106 of the casing, stands vertically thereon and forms an angle γ=20° with the vertically downward direction. The landing flap 400 is shown in a lowered position, in which the casing 100 dips into the propulsive jet of the engine during operation thereof.
  • Furthermore, flux lines 410 are shown in FIG. 4, which have been numerically calculated by a hybrid Navier-Stokes method common in fluid mechanics, in order to simulate the aerodynamic flux around the casing 100 in the position shown, upon full thrust of the engine on the ground. A first group 414 of flux lines indicates a flow on the bottom wall of the casing 100, which flow is orientated substantially along the strake 104 in the direction of flight as far as the back end 406 of the casing 100. A second group 412 of flux lines indicates a flow on the board internal side wall of the casing 100, which flow is also directed substantially along the strake 104 in the direction of flight as far as the back end 406 of the casing 100 where it combines with the flow of the first group 414. There is a stable flow without oscillations that cause vibrations. In addition, the flow shown produces an initial stress of the casing 100 directed towards the internal side of the board (to the viewer), which, irrespective of the existence of oscillations, prevents the material of the casing 100 from being loaded alternately in compression and tension, and thus prevents material fatigue.
  • FIG. 5 is a bottom view of the portion of the casing from FIG. 4 with the simulated flow of the simulation from FIG. 4. The curve of the strake can clearly be recognised, the trailing edge 206 of which at its back end 204 is higher than the leading edge at the front end 200 of the same strake.
  • FIGS. 6 and 7 show for comparison a back portion of a conventional landing flap casing, with simulated flow according to the same method as in FIGS. 4 and 5. The configuration shown corresponds to the conventional casing of the outermost flap tracks of the Airbus A380.
  • The first group 414 of flux lines, which flows along the bottom wall of the casing, comprises a considerable number of flux lines with components orientated upwards in the direction of the side wall of the casing 100. The second group 412 of flux lines which flows along the casing 100 on the side wall also comprises a considerable number of flux lines with components orientated downwards towards the floor wall. The flux fields formed by the first group 414 and second group 412 meet in the region of the radius of the casing 100, which radius is inside the board, to form an unstable vortex system which, according to the given local distribution of compression, hunts around the radius which connects the floor and side wall of the casing 100. The unstable vortex system leads to an oscillating pressure distribution on the upper surface of the casing, which distribution causes material-damaging vibrations.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic perspective view of a strake of a casing according to an embodiment, for example the embodiment from FIG. 1. The strake 104 has a rectangular cross-sectional profile of thickness D and a rectangular upper edge 208. A lower edge 210 is fit to the contour curve of the outer surface of the flap track casing. On the leading end 200 the strake begins with a leading edge 202 substantially perpendicular to the outer surface of the casing, which edge is of height H1, extends along the upper edge 208 over its length in the form of a spline which reaches a maximum height H3 in a position at a distance from both ends, and finishes at the back end 204 of the strake with a trailing edge which is also substantially vertical on the outer surface of the casing 100 and has the height H2.
  • FIG. 3 shows simulated function curves of pressure distributions on differently formed strakes which all correspond to the basic form described by means of FIG. 2, assuming that the thickness D is always 3 mm, the height H1 is always 1 cm, and the height H2 is always 15 cm. In each case, the simulation is based on a configuration such as those shown in FIGS. 4 to 7, irrespective of the form of the strake.
  • The curves 311 to 313 each correspond to a strake of length L=300 cm, the longitudinal coordinates along the horizontal axis 304 denoting the distance from the centre of the aerodynamic system of the aircraft. The strake forms an angle of γ=0° with the downward vertical in the case of curve 311, an angle of γ=30° in the case of curve 312, and an angle of γ=20° in the case of curve 312. Along the vertical axis 302, each curve shows the pressure distributions on the strake at the respective longitudinal coordinates, the atmospheric pressure 300 having been marked separately on the bottom.
  • In the case of curves 314 to 316, a strake of length L=203 cm has been assumed, which is arranged further towards the back end of the casing, as can be seen from the longitudinal coordinates. The strake forms an angle of γ=0° with the downward vertical in the case of curve 314, an angle of γ=20° in the case of curve 315, and an angle of γ=40° in the case of curve 316. A particularly advantageous pressure distribution is shown by curve 313, in which the pressure varies gently over the length of the strake and the line of the atmospheric pressure 300 is not crossed, so that the strake and the casing are not exposed to varying pressure and tensile stresses.
  • A strake of this type can, for example, be produced from a composite material and connected to the outer wall of the casing by means of fastening elements integrated into this wall.
  • Although the present invention has presently been described on the basis of preferred embodiments, it is not restricted thereto, but can be modified in many different ways.
  • For example, the invention can also be applied to types of lifting aids other than flap track casings, as well as to actual loads, inter alia, which are mounted underneath the aerofoils or in other places which are accessible to the propulsive jet of a jet engine.
  • LIST OF REFERENCE NUMERALS
  • 100 flap track casing
  • 101 longitudinal axis of the casing
  • 102 flap track
  • 104 strake
  • 106 outer surface
  • 108 vertically downward direction
  • 110 transverse profile
  • 112 jet engine
  • 114 jet
  • 116 engine mount casing
  • 118 aircraft
  • 120 aircraft fuselage
  • 200 front end of the strake
  • 202 leading edge
  • 204 back end of the strake
  • 206 trailing edge
  • 208 upper edge
  • 210 lower edge
  • 300 atmospheric pressure
  • 302 simulated pressure distribution
  • 304 x-coordinates of the aerodynamic system
  • 311-316 pressure distribution curve
  • 400, 401 landing flap
  • 402 aerofoil
  • 404 trailing edge of the aerofoil
  • 406 back end of the casing
  • 410 flux lines
  • 412 flux on the side wall
  • 414 flux on the floor wall
  • D thickness of the strake
  • H1 height of the leading edge
  • H2 height of the trailing edge
  • H3 maximum height
  • γ angle to downward vertical

Claims (17)

1. An aircraft, comprising:
an engine mount;
a lifting aid comprising a flap track casing, wherein the flap track casing is arranged at substantially a same distance from a fuselage of the aircraft as the engine mount, the flap track casing having at least one strake which projects substantially in a direction of flight of the aircraft extending from an outer surface of the flap track casing; and
a jet engine which is arranged such that the flap track casing, at least during take-off of the aircraft, is configured to dip at least partially into a jet of the jet engine and the jet applies a transverse force to the strake so that the flap track casing is loaded by the jet in one direction with an initial stress, which prevents the flap track casing from being loaded alternately in compression and tension.
2. The aircraft of claim 1, wherein the strake is formed as a planar or surface-optimized structure.
3. The aircraft of claim 1, wherein the strake is formed as a plate or plank of a substantially constant thickness.
4. The aircraft of claim 1, wherein the strake projects substantially vertically from the outer surface.
5. The aircraft of claim 1, wherein the strake is at an angle of between 0° and 40° to a downward vertical direction.
6. The aircraft of claim 1, wherein the strake has a length of from 1 m to 3 m along the outer surface.
7. The aircraft of claim 1, wherein the strake comprises one edge of lower edges facing the outer surface, which one edge is fit to a contour curve of the outer surface.
8. The aircraft of claim 7, wherein the one edge is connected to the contour curve of the outer surface by fastening elements integrated into the surface.
9. The aircraft of claim 1, wherein the strake comprises one edge of upper edges remote from the outer surface, which one edge extends in a form of a spline over the outer surface.
10. The aircraft of claim 1, wherein the strake comprises a leading edge at its front end and/or a trailing edge at its back end, which extend substantially vertically from the outer surface of the flap track casing.
11. The aircraft of claim 1, wherein the strake has a smaller height at its front end than at its back end.
12. The aircraft of claim 1, wherein the strake has a height of 1 cm or less on its front end.
13. The aircraft of 1, wherein the strake has a height of 15 cm or less on its back end.
14. The aircraft of claim 1, wherein the strake has a maximum height at a position at a distance from its front end and/or back end.
15. The aircraft of claim 1, wherein the strake has a thickness of from 2 mm to 5 mm.
16. The aircraft of claim 1, wherein the strake has a substantially rectangular transverse profile on an upper edge.
17. The aircraft according to claim 1, wherein the strake is formed on a side of the casing facing the jet.
US15/587,902 2009-05-13 2017-05-05 Aircraft comprising a casing for a lifting aid Abandoned US20170305528A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/587,902 US20170305528A1 (en) 2009-05-13 2017-05-05 Aircraft comprising a casing for a lifting aid

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US17783109P 2009-05-13 2009-05-13
DE102009003084.0 2009-05-13
DE102009003084A DE102009003084B4 (en) 2009-05-13 2009-05-13 Cladding for a buoyancy aid
PCT/EP2010/056374 WO2010130690A2 (en) 2009-05-13 2010-05-10 Casing for a lifting aid
US13/293,570 US9669920B2 (en) 2009-05-13 2011-11-10 Casing for a lifting aid
US15/587,902 US20170305528A1 (en) 2009-05-13 2017-05-05 Aircraft comprising a casing for a lifting aid

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/293,570 Continuation US9669920B2 (en) 2009-05-13 2011-11-10 Casing for a lifting aid

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20170305528A1 true US20170305528A1 (en) 2017-10-26

Family

ID=42978900

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/293,570 Active US9669920B2 (en) 2009-05-13 2011-11-10 Casing for a lifting aid
US15/587,902 Abandoned US20170305528A1 (en) 2009-05-13 2017-05-05 Aircraft comprising a casing for a lifting aid

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/293,570 Active US9669920B2 (en) 2009-05-13 2011-11-10 Casing for a lifting aid

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (2) US9669920B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2429895B1 (en)
CN (1) CN102438893B (en)
DE (1) DE102009003084B4 (en)
RU (1) RU2011145806A (en)
WO (1) WO2010130690A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2982236B1 (en) * 2011-11-03 2014-06-27 Snecma HOOK PYLONE FOR TURBOMACHINE
DE102012111690A1 (en) * 2012-11-30 2014-06-05 Airbus Operations Gmbh A variable-shape aerodynamic fairing body for a flap adjustment mechanism of an aircraft
FR3045012B1 (en) * 2015-12-11 2017-12-08 Airbus Operations Sas TURBOMACHINE ATTACHING MAT WITH THERMAL PROTECTION ELEMENT
US10723445B2 (en) 2017-05-16 2020-07-28 Rohr, Inc. Strake for aircraft propulsion system nacelle
US20190225318A1 (en) * 2018-01-25 2019-07-25 General Electric Company Aircraft systems and methods
RU2752502C1 (en) * 2020-12-18 2021-07-28 Акционерное общество "Национальный центр вертолетостроения им. М.Л. Миля и Н.И. Камова" (АО "НЦВ Миль и Камов") Aerodynamic profile of the aircraft carrier element
RU2762464C1 (en) * 2021-05-14 2021-12-21 Акционерное общество "Национальный центр вертолетостроения им. М.Л. Миля и Н.И. Камова" (АО "НЦВ Миль и Камов") Aerodynamic profile of the aircraft carrier

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3960345A (en) * 1975-05-16 1976-06-01 Grumman Aerospace Corporation Means to reduce and/or eliminate vortices, caused by wing body combinations
US4540143A (en) * 1983-08-04 1985-09-10 The Boeing Company Nacelle/wing assembly with wake control device
US4685643A (en) * 1983-08-04 1987-08-11 The Boeing Company Nacelle/wing assembly with vortex control device
US4712750A (en) * 1986-05-02 1987-12-15 The Boeing Company Temperature control device for jet engine nacelle associated structure
US5069402A (en) * 1990-04-06 1991-12-03 Istar, Inc. Alleviation of aircraft fuselage form drag
US7334760B1 (en) * 2003-01-03 2008-02-26 Orbital Research Inc. Flow control device and method of controlling flow
US20080067292A1 (en) * 2006-09-18 2008-03-20 Airbus France Vortex generator at hot gas output
US20090261198A1 (en) * 2008-04-21 2009-10-22 Airbus France Pylon for suspending a turboengine
US8087617B2 (en) * 2008-08-15 2012-01-03 The Boeing Company Retractable nacelle chine

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3578264A (en) * 1968-07-09 1971-05-11 Battelle Development Corp Boundary layer control of flow separation and heat exchange
US3744745A (en) * 1971-09-30 1973-07-10 Mc Donnell Douglas Corp Liftvanes
US4019696A (en) * 1973-12-28 1977-04-26 The Boeing Company Method of and apparatus for enhancing Coanda flow attachment over a wing and flap surface
US4354648A (en) * 1980-02-06 1982-10-19 Gates Learjet Corporation Airstream modification device for airfoils
US4466587A (en) * 1981-12-21 1984-08-21 General Electric Company Nacelle installation
AU555526B2 (en) 1982-10-29 1986-09-25 General Electric Company Aircraft engine nacelle
DE3641247A1 (en) * 1986-12-03 1988-06-16 Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm LANDING VALVE GUIDE RAIL FAIRING FOR AIRCRAFT
JP3714722B2 (en) * 1996-05-09 2005-11-09 本田技研工業株式会社 Peeling suppression device
US6964397B2 (en) * 2003-07-18 2005-11-15 The Boeing Company Nacelle chine installation for drag reduction
EP1627811B1 (en) * 2004-08-20 2011-10-12 The Boeing Company Nacelle chine installation for drag reduction
FR2891525B1 (en) * 2005-09-30 2007-11-09 Airbus France Sas DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING A TOURBILLONARY WAKE GENERATED BY AN OBLONG ELEMENT ON THE EXTRADOS OF A CARRYING SURFACE OF AN AIRCRAFT.
RU72198U1 (en) 2007-02-20 2008-04-10 Владимир Тарасович Шведов AIRCRAFT WITH HIGH AERODYNAMIC QUALITY

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3960345A (en) * 1975-05-16 1976-06-01 Grumman Aerospace Corporation Means to reduce and/or eliminate vortices, caused by wing body combinations
US4540143A (en) * 1983-08-04 1985-09-10 The Boeing Company Nacelle/wing assembly with wake control device
US4685643A (en) * 1983-08-04 1987-08-11 The Boeing Company Nacelle/wing assembly with vortex control device
US4712750A (en) * 1986-05-02 1987-12-15 The Boeing Company Temperature control device for jet engine nacelle associated structure
US5069402A (en) * 1990-04-06 1991-12-03 Istar, Inc. Alleviation of aircraft fuselage form drag
US7334760B1 (en) * 2003-01-03 2008-02-26 Orbital Research Inc. Flow control device and method of controlling flow
US20080067292A1 (en) * 2006-09-18 2008-03-20 Airbus France Vortex generator at hot gas output
US20090261198A1 (en) * 2008-04-21 2009-10-22 Airbus France Pylon for suspending a turboengine
US8087617B2 (en) * 2008-08-15 2012-01-03 The Boeing Company Retractable nacelle chine

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102009003084B4 (en) 2013-03-14
RU2011145806A (en) 2013-05-20
EP2429895A2 (en) 2012-03-21
WO2010130690A3 (en) 2011-04-28
EP2429895B1 (en) 2013-04-17
DE102009003084A1 (en) 2010-11-18
US20120112011A1 (en) 2012-05-10
US9669920B2 (en) 2017-06-06
CN102438893A (en) 2012-05-02
WO2010130690A2 (en) 2010-11-18
CN102438893B (en) 2014-12-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20170305528A1 (en) Aircraft comprising a casing for a lifting aid
CN101687542B (en) Engine nacelle of an aircraft comprising a vortex generator arrangement
EP2214958B1 (en) Method and apparatus for enhancing engine-powered lift in an aircraft
US8186617B2 (en) Aircraft having a lambda-box wing configuration
US20060186261A1 (en) Vertical take-off and landing aircraft
US20090084904A1 (en) Wingtip Feathers, Including Paired, Fixed Feathers, and Associated Systems and Methods
US9272772B2 (en) Surface element for an aircraft, aircraft and method for improving high-lift generation on a surface element
US10384766B2 (en) Aircraft wing roughness strip and method
US20060060720A1 (en) Methods and systems for controlling lower surface shocks
US8146868B2 (en) Pylon for suspending a turboengine
US6964397B2 (en) Nacelle chine installation for drag reduction
US20090230251A1 (en) Airplane engine pylon comprising at least one protruding element to generate a vortex of the airflow
EP3205581A1 (en) Aircraft and empennage section of an aircraft
JP7072411B2 (en) Aircraft radome equipment and methods
US6959896B2 (en) Passive aerodynamic sonic boom suppression for supersonic aircraft
EP0995675B1 (en) Method for reducing wave resistance in airplane
US6308913B1 (en) Method for reducing wave resistance in airplane
CN106828933B (en) A kind of high altitude long time tandem rotor aircraft aerodynamic arrangement using upper inverted diherdral difference
US8167249B1 (en) Controllable upper surface blown nozzle
CN103612746A (en) Fairing structure for pylon of aircraft with wing-mounted layout
WO2020040671A1 (en) Methods for improvements of the closed wing aircraft concept and corresponding aircraft configurations
US8740139B1 (en) Leading edge snag for exposed propeller engine installation
US20190256188A1 (en) Airfoil Modification To Improve Fuel Efficiency
WO2007104940A1 (en) Aircraft
Kentfield Drag reductions possible with aircraft employing outboard horizontal stabilizers

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EMUNDS, ROLF;REEL/FRAME:042967/0941

Effective date: 20170524

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION