US20170305528A1 - Aircraft comprising a casing for a lifting aid - Google Patents
Aircraft comprising a casing for a lifting aid Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20170305528A1 US20170305528A1 US15/587,902 US201715587902A US2017305528A1 US 20170305528 A1 US20170305528 A1 US 20170305528A1 US 201715587902 A US201715587902 A US 201715587902A US 2017305528 A1 US2017305528 A1 US 2017305528A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- aircraft
- strake
- casing
- jet
- edge
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C7/00—Structures or fairings not otherwise provided for
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C9/00—Adjustable control surfaces or members, e.g. rudders
- B64C9/02—Mounting or supporting thereof
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C9/00—Adjustable control surfaces or members, e.g. rudders
- B64C9/14—Adjustable control surfaces or members, e.g. rudders forming slots
- B64C9/16—Adjustable control surfaces or members, e.g. rudders forming slots at the rear of the wing
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C23/00—Influencing air flow over aircraft surfaces, not otherwise provided for
- B64C23/06—Influencing air flow over aircraft surfaces, not otherwise provided for by generating vortices
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a casing for a lifting aid for an aircraft, in particular for a flap track of an aircraft.
- the invention further relates to an aircraft with a lifting aid and a casing of this type.
- Aircraft of this type generally comprise so-called “landing flaps” which can be extended during the take-off and landing phases to provide increased aerodynamic lift at slow flight speeds.
- the landing flaps are usually arranged in the flap tracks on the underside of the aerofoils.
- the flap tracks are enclosed by corresponding aerodynamically optimized casings which can in addition be configured to produce aerodynamic lift.
- undesirable vibrations of the flap track casing can, however, occur owing to the effect of the propulsive jet of an engine.
- particular operating states of the aircraft can promote the occurrence of vibrations, for example if the aircraft is still on the ground during maximum thrust or accelerates while still on the runway.
- the vibrations can lead to damage, for example hairline cracks in the flap track casing or supports thereof, to the point of a complete breakdown of the structure in the pivot region.
- a strake which projects from an outer surface of the casing and extends substantially in the direction of flight.
- a strake is to be understood here as a planar (surface-optimized) structure such as a plate or plank.
- the strake projects from the outer surface of the casing and extends substantially in the direction of flight of the aircraft, the strake obstructs aerodynamic fluxes on the outer surface of the casing which comprise significant flux components perpendicular to the direction of flight. In this way, if the casing dips into the propulsive jet, for example during the take-off phase, the formation of unstable, oscillating vortex systems due to flux components of this type are suppressed and a stable aerodynamic flux is produced and flows around the casing. Because of the presence of oscillating vortex systems, no significant oscillating pressure variations and therefore no forces causing damaging vibrations occur on the outer surface of the casing.
- the strake projects substantially vertically from the outer surface. Flux components extending transverse to the strake are thus particularly effectively obstructed on both sides.
- the strake forms an angle of between 0° and 40° with a vertically downward direction. This has the effect that in the case of oncoming flow, a transverse force is applied which displays no zero passages, so that the casing and strake are particularly gently loaded in only one direction.
- the strake has a length of from 1 m to 3 m along the outer surface of the casing. A strake of this length adequately stabilizes the aerodynamic flux in the case of low inherent weight.
- the strake comprises a leading edge on its front end and/or a trailing edge on its back end, which extend perpendicular to the outer surface of the casing. This produces a controlled oncoming flow of the leading edge or a controlled stall of the trailing edge.
- the strake has a lower height at its front end than at its back end.
- the height of the strake at its front end is preferably 1 cm or less, so that the formation of vortices on the leading edge is eliminated.
- the strake has a height of 15 cm or less at its back end.
- a strake of this height stabilizes the aerodynamic flux adequately in the case of sufficient inherent stability and low inherent weight.
- the strake has a maximum height at a position at a distance from its front and back ends.
- the strake has a thickness between 2 mm and 5 mm. This enables a high stability of the strake in the case of low weight.
- the strake preferably has a substantially rectangular transverse profile. This enables a controlled stall on the upper edge.
- the invention provides an aircraft with a lifting aid which comprises a casing of this type.
- the aircraft preferably comprises a propulsive jet that is arranged in such a way that during the operating phase of the aircraft, the casing at least partially dips into a jet of the jet engine.
- jet engines and lifting aids can be optimized in their position without constructive restrictions and without the occurrence of damage to the casing.
- the strake is formed on one of the sides of the casing which faces the jet.
- the strake thus works particularly efficiently, directly at the location of the direct oncoming flow via the propulsive jet.
- FIGS. 1A-B are sectional views in the direction of flight of an aircraft aerofoil having a casing in accordance with two embodiments of the invention
- FIG. 2 is a schematic perspective view of a strake of a casing in accordance with an embodiment
- FIG. 3 shows simulated function curves of pressure distributions on strakes of casings in accordance with different embodiments
- FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a back portion of a casing in accordance with an embodiment, with simulated flow
- FIG. 5 is a bottom view of the portion of the casing from FIG. 4 , with simulated flow;
- FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a back portion of a conventional casing, with simulated flow.
- FIG. 7 is a bottom view of the portion of the casing from FIG. 6 , with simulated flow.
- FIG. 1A is in a schematic rear view of a portion of an aerofoil 402 of a jet-driven commercial aircraft 118 , which aerofoil is fixed on a fuselage 120 of the aircraft 118 .
- the viewing direction of the viewer corresponds to the direction of flight of the aircraft 118 .
- the aerofoil 402 On its trailing edge 404 which is facing the viewer, the aerofoil 402 comprises landing flaps 400 , 401 which are supported so as to be retractable from a flap track as a lifting aid.
- the flap track itself is enclosed by a casing 100 and is not shown in the drawing of FIG. 1A .
- the flap track casing 100 extends substantially in the direction of flight along a portion of the underside of the aerofoil 402 , in the present case, for example, from approximately the centre of the aerofoil 402 as far as its trailing edge 404 or marginally beyond this.
- an engine mount 116 is fixed on the underside of the aerofoil 402 near the flap track casing 100 , and holds a jet engine 112 of the aircraft 118 .
- the jet engine 112 produces a propulsive jet 114 counter to the direction of flight, the cross-section and direction of which depend on the operating state of the aircraft 118 .
- the dashed line in FIG. 1A marks highly schematically a cross-section of the propulsive jet 114 in the region of the trailing edge 404 of the aerofoil during operation of the jet engine 112 on the ground, for example when it is not moving, or during acceleration on the ground during take-off.
- the propulsive jet 114 is deflected outwards under the effect of the ground, the landing flap casing 100 dipping partially into the propulsive jet 114 , and to a greater extent when the casing 100 of the flap track is lowered further towards the bottom than shown, in order to extend the landing flaps 400 , 401 .
- the flap track casing 100 is arranged at substantially the same distance from the aircraft fuselage 120 as the engine mount 116 , purely by way of example.
- the engine mount 116 can, for example, comprise an engine mount casing which transitions into the casing 100 of the flap track.
- FIG. 1B shows an alternative embodiment in which, by way of example, the flap track casing 100 is arranged offset in relation to the engine mount 116 in the direction of the internal side of the board, that is to say towards the fuselage 120 . It is assumed here that the flap track casing 100 and the engine mount 116 are offset at a distance in this way so that during operation of the jet engine 112 on the ground and outward deflection of the jet 114 due to the divergence of the jet 114 from the external side of the board, the propulsive jet 114 encounters the casing 100 .
- a strake is fixed on the outer surface 106 of the flap track casing 100 on the side facing the jet 114 , meaning in this case on the external side of the board.
- FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a back portion of a flap track casing 100 in accordance with a further embodiment which is based on the casing of the furthest outside located flap track of the Airbus A380.
- the outermost engine is arranged at an equal distance from the aircraft fuselage and the flap track casing 100 shown.
- the landing flap 400 is shown in a lowered position, in which the casing 100 dips into the propulsive jet of the engine during operation thereof.
- flux lines 410 are shown in FIG. 4 , which have been numerically calculated by a hybrid Navier-Stokes method common in fluid mechanics, in order to simulate the aerodynamic flux around the casing 100 in the position shown, upon full thrust of the engine on the ground.
- a first group 414 of flux lines indicates a flow on the bottom wall of the casing 100 , which flow is orientated substantially along the strake 104 in the direction of flight as far as the back end 406 of the casing 100 .
- a second group 412 of flux lines indicates a flow on the board internal side wall of the casing 100 , which flow is also directed substantially along the strake 104 in the direction of flight as far as the back end 406 of the casing 100 where it combines with the flow of the first group 414 .
- the flow shown produces an initial stress of the casing 100 directed towards the internal side of the board (to the viewer), which, irrespective of the existence of oscillations, prevents the material of the casing 100 from being loaded alternately in compression and tension, and thus prevents material fatigue.
- FIG. 5 is a bottom view of the portion of the casing from FIG. 4 with the simulated flow of the simulation from FIG. 4 .
- the curve of the strake can clearly be recognised, the trailing edge 206 of which at its back end 204 is higher than the leading edge at the front end 200 of the same strake.
- FIGS. 6 and 7 show for comparison a back portion of a conventional landing flap casing, with simulated flow according to the same method as in FIGS. 4 and 5 .
- the configuration shown corresponds to the conventional casing of the outermost flap tracks of the Airbus A380.
- the first group 414 of flux lines which flows along the bottom wall of the casing, comprises a considerable number of flux lines with components orientated upwards in the direction of the side wall of the casing 100 .
- the second group 412 of flux lines which flows along the casing 100 on the side wall also comprises a considerable number of flux lines with components orientated downwards towards the floor wall.
- the flux fields formed by the first group 414 and second group 412 meet in the region of the radius of the casing 100 , which radius is inside the board, to form an unstable vortex system which, according to the given local distribution of compression, hunts around the radius which connects the floor and side wall of the casing 100 .
- the unstable vortex system leads to an oscillating pressure distribution on the upper surface of the casing, which distribution causes material-damaging vibrations.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic perspective view of a strake of a casing according to an embodiment, for example the embodiment from FIG. 1 .
- the strake 104 has a rectangular cross-sectional profile of thickness D and a rectangular upper edge 208 .
- a lower edge 210 is fit to the contour curve of the outer surface of the flap track casing.
- the strake begins with a leading edge 202 substantially perpendicular to the outer surface of the casing, which edge is of height H 1 , extends along the upper edge 208 over its length in the form of a spline which reaches a maximum height H 3 in a position at a distance from both ends, and finishes at the back end 204 of the strake with a trailing edge which is also substantially vertical on the outer surface of the casing 100 and has the height H 2 .
- FIG. 3 shows simulated function curves of pressure distributions on differently formed strakes which all correspond to the basic form described by means of FIG. 2 , assuming that the thickness D is always 3 mm, the height H 1 is always 1 cm, and the height H 2 is always 15 cm. In each case, the simulation is based on a configuration such as those shown in FIGS. 4 to 7 , irrespective of the form of the strake.
- each curve shows the pressure distributions on the strake at the respective longitudinal coordinates, the atmospheric pressure 300 having been marked separately on the bottom.
- a strake of this type can, for example, be produced from a composite material and connected to the outer wall of the casing by means of fastening elements integrated into this wall.
- the invention can also be applied to types of lifting aids other than flap track casings, as well as to actual loads, inter alia, which are mounted underneath the aerofoils or in other places which are accessible to the propulsive jet of a jet engine.
Abstract
Description
- This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/293,570 filed Nov. 10, 2011, which claims priority to PCT/EP2010/056374 filed May 10, 2010 which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/177,831, and German Patent Application No. 10 2009 003 084.0, filed May 13, 2009, the entire disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.
- The present invention relates to a casing for a lifting aid for an aircraft, in particular for a flap track of an aircraft. The invention further relates to an aircraft with a lifting aid and a casing of this type.
- Although applicable to any aircraft or spacecraft casings, the present invention and the problem on which it is based will be explained in greater detail with reference to flap track casings of jet engine commercial aircraft.
- Aircraft of this type generally comprise so-called “landing flaps” which can be extended during the take-off and landing phases to provide increased aerodynamic lift at slow flight speeds. For this purpose, the landing flaps are usually arranged in the flap tracks on the underside of the aerofoils. In order to keep air resistance as low as possible at full cruising speed, the flap tracks are enclosed by corresponding aerodynamically optimized casings which can in addition be configured to produce aerodynamic lift.
- In particular in the case of aircraft with jet engines located on the underside of the aerofoils, undesirable vibrations of the flap track casing can, however, occur owing to the effect of the propulsive jet of an engine. Along with spatial closeness of the engine and flap track casing, particular operating states of the aircraft can promote the occurrence of vibrations, for example if the aircraft is still on the ground during maximum thrust or accelerates while still on the runway. The vibrations can lead to damage, for example hairline cracks in the flap track casing or supports thereof, to the point of a complete breakdown of the structure in the pivot region.
- It is therefore an object of the present invention to eliminate damaging effects of the propulsive jets on casings of lifting aids such as flap tracks.
- The idea behind the present invention involves forming at least one strake which projects from an outer surface of the casing and extends substantially in the direction of flight. A strake is to be understood here as a planar (surface-optimized) structure such as a plate or plank.
- Because the strake projects from the outer surface of the casing and extends substantially in the direction of flight of the aircraft, the strake obstructs aerodynamic fluxes on the outer surface of the casing which comprise significant flux components perpendicular to the direction of flight. In this way, if the casing dips into the propulsive jet, for example during the take-off phase, the formation of unstable, oscillating vortex systems due to flux components of this type are suppressed and a stable aerodynamic flux is produced and flows around the casing. Because of the presence of oscillating vortex systems, no significant oscillating pressure variations and therefore no forces causing damaging vibrations occur on the outer surface of the casing.
- According to a preferred development, the strake projects substantially vertically from the outer surface. Flux components extending transverse to the strake are thus particularly effectively obstructed on both sides.
- According to a preferred development, the strake forms an angle of between 0° and 40° with a vertically downward direction. This has the effect that in the case of oncoming flow, a transverse force is applied which displays no zero passages, so that the casing and strake are particularly gently loaded in only one direction.
- According to a preferred development, the strake has a length of from 1 m to 3 m along the outer surface of the casing. A strake of this length adequately stabilizes the aerodynamic flux in the case of low inherent weight.
- According to a preferred development, the strake comprises a leading edge on its front end and/or a trailing edge on its back end, which extend perpendicular to the outer surface of the casing. This produces a controlled oncoming flow of the leading edge or a controlled stall of the trailing edge.
- According to a preferred development, the strake has a lower height at its front end than at its back end. The height of the strake at its front end is preferably 1 cm or less, so that the formation of vortices on the leading edge is eliminated.
- According to a preferred development, the strake has a height of 15 cm or less at its back end. A strake of this height stabilizes the aerodynamic flux adequately in the case of sufficient inherent stability and low inherent weight. Preferably, the strake has a maximum height at a position at a distance from its front and back ends.
- According to a preferred development, the strake has a thickness between 2 mm and 5 mm. This enables a high stability of the strake in the case of low weight. The strake preferably has a substantially rectangular transverse profile. This enables a controlled stall on the upper edge.
- According to a preferred development, the invention provides an aircraft with a lifting aid which comprises a casing of this type. The aircraft preferably comprises a propulsive jet that is arranged in such a way that during the operating phase of the aircraft, the casing at least partially dips into a jet of the jet engine. In this way, jet engines and lifting aids can be optimized in their position without constructive restrictions and without the occurrence of damage to the casing.
- According to a preferred development, the strake is formed on one of the sides of the casing which faces the jet. The strake thus works particularly efficiently, directly at the location of the direct oncoming flow via the propulsive jet.
- The invention will be further explained using embodiments with reference to the accompanying figures.
- In the figures:
-
FIGS. 1A-B are sectional views in the direction of flight of an aircraft aerofoil having a casing in accordance with two embodiments of the invention; -
FIG. 2 is a schematic perspective view of a strake of a casing in accordance with an embodiment; -
FIG. 3 shows simulated function curves of pressure distributions on strakes of casings in accordance with different embodiments; -
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a back portion of a casing in accordance with an embodiment, with simulated flow; -
FIG. 5 is a bottom view of the portion of the casing fromFIG. 4 , with simulated flow; -
FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a back portion of a conventional casing, with simulated flow; and -
FIG. 7 is a bottom view of the portion of the casing fromFIG. 6 , with simulated flow. - In the figures, the same reference numerals denote identical or functionally identical components, unless indicated otherwise.
-
FIG. 1A is in a schematic rear view of a portion of anaerofoil 402 of a jet-drivencommercial aircraft 118, which aerofoil is fixed on afuselage 120 of theaircraft 118. The viewing direction of the viewer corresponds to the direction of flight of theaircraft 118. On itstrailing edge 404 which is facing the viewer, theaerofoil 402 compriseslanding flaps casing 100 and is not shown in the drawing ofFIG. 1A . Theflap track casing 100 extends substantially in the direction of flight along a portion of the underside of theaerofoil 402, in the present case, for example, from approximately the centre of theaerofoil 402 as far as itstrailing edge 404 or marginally beyond this. - Likewise, an
engine mount 116 is fixed on the underside of theaerofoil 402 near theflap track casing 100, and holds ajet engine 112 of theaircraft 118. During operation thejet engine 112 produces apropulsive jet 114 counter to the direction of flight, the cross-section and direction of which depend on the operating state of theaircraft 118. The dashed line inFIG. 1A marks highly schematically a cross-section of thepropulsive jet 114 in the region of the trailingedge 404 of the aerofoil during operation of thejet engine 112 on the ground, for example when it is not moving, or during acceleration on the ground during take-off. In this operating state, thepropulsive jet 114 is deflected outwards under the effect of the ground, thelanding flap casing 100 dipping partially into thepropulsive jet 114, and to a greater extent when thecasing 100 of the flap track is lowered further towards the bottom than shown, in order to extend the landing flaps 400, 401. - In the present embodiment the
flap track casing 100 is arranged at substantially the same distance from theaircraft fuselage 120 as theengine mount 116, purely by way of example. Theengine mount 116 can, for example, comprise an engine mount casing which transitions into thecasing 100 of the flap track. - On the
outer surface 106 of the flap track casing 100 astrake 104 is fixed on the side facing thejet 114, meaning in this case on the internal side of the board, the outwardly deflected jet of which encounters thecasing 100, which strake extends along theouter surface 106 of thecasing 100 in the direction of flight and finishes in an approximately vertical trailing edge on theouter surface 106 at its end which is turned towards the viewer. Thestrake 104 extends in a plane which forms an angle γ of approximately 40° with the verticallydownward direction 108 and is substantially vertical on theouter surface 106 of the casing. With respect to alongitudinal axis 122 of thecasing 100, the plane of thestrake 104 extends substantially radially. -
FIG. 1B shows an alternative embodiment in which, by way of example, theflap track casing 100 is arranged offset in relation to theengine mount 116 in the direction of the internal side of the board, that is to say towards thefuselage 120. It is assumed here that theflap track casing 100 and theengine mount 116 are offset at a distance in this way so that during operation of thejet engine 112 on the ground and outward deflection of thejet 114 due to the divergence of thejet 114 from the external side of the board, thepropulsive jet 114 encounters thecasing 100. A strake is fixed on theouter surface 106 of theflap track casing 100 on the side facing thejet 114, meaning in this case on the external side of the board. -
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a back portion of aflap track casing 100 in accordance with a further embodiment which is based on the casing of the furthest outside located flap track of the Airbus A380. In this type of aircraft, the outermost engine is arranged at an equal distance from the aircraft fuselage and theflap track casing 100 shown. Astrake 104 has been attached to the internal side of the board, seen by the viewer ofFIG. 4 , which strake extends over a length of 3 m along theouter wall 106 of the casing, stands vertically thereon and forms an angle γ=20° with the vertically downward direction. Thelanding flap 400 is shown in a lowered position, in which thecasing 100 dips into the propulsive jet of the engine during operation thereof. - Furthermore,
flux lines 410 are shown inFIG. 4 , which have been numerically calculated by a hybrid Navier-Stokes method common in fluid mechanics, in order to simulate the aerodynamic flux around thecasing 100 in the position shown, upon full thrust of the engine on the ground. Afirst group 414 of flux lines indicates a flow on the bottom wall of thecasing 100, which flow is orientated substantially along thestrake 104 in the direction of flight as far as theback end 406 of thecasing 100. Asecond group 412 of flux lines indicates a flow on the board internal side wall of thecasing 100, which flow is also directed substantially along thestrake 104 in the direction of flight as far as theback end 406 of thecasing 100 where it combines with the flow of thefirst group 414. There is a stable flow without oscillations that cause vibrations. In addition, the flow shown produces an initial stress of thecasing 100 directed towards the internal side of the board (to the viewer), which, irrespective of the existence of oscillations, prevents the material of thecasing 100 from being loaded alternately in compression and tension, and thus prevents material fatigue. -
FIG. 5 is a bottom view of the portion of the casing fromFIG. 4 with the simulated flow of the simulation fromFIG. 4 . The curve of the strake can clearly be recognised, the trailingedge 206 of which at itsback end 204 is higher than the leading edge at thefront end 200 of the same strake. -
FIGS. 6 and 7 show for comparison a back portion of a conventional landing flap casing, with simulated flow according to the same method as inFIGS. 4 and 5 . The configuration shown corresponds to the conventional casing of the outermost flap tracks of the Airbus A380. - The
first group 414 of flux lines, which flows along the bottom wall of the casing, comprises a considerable number of flux lines with components orientated upwards in the direction of the side wall of thecasing 100. Thesecond group 412 of flux lines which flows along thecasing 100 on the side wall also comprises a considerable number of flux lines with components orientated downwards towards the floor wall. The flux fields formed by thefirst group 414 andsecond group 412 meet in the region of the radius of thecasing 100, which radius is inside the board, to form an unstable vortex system which, according to the given local distribution of compression, hunts around the radius which connects the floor and side wall of thecasing 100. The unstable vortex system leads to an oscillating pressure distribution on the upper surface of the casing, which distribution causes material-damaging vibrations. -
FIG. 2 is a schematic perspective view of a strake of a casing according to an embodiment, for example the embodiment fromFIG. 1 . Thestrake 104 has a rectangular cross-sectional profile of thickness D and a rectangularupper edge 208. A lower edge 210 is fit to the contour curve of the outer surface of the flap track casing. On theleading end 200 the strake begins with aleading edge 202 substantially perpendicular to the outer surface of the casing, which edge is of height H1, extends along theupper edge 208 over its length in the form of a spline which reaches a maximum height H3 in a position at a distance from both ends, and finishes at theback end 204 of the strake with a trailing edge which is also substantially vertical on the outer surface of thecasing 100 and has the height H2. -
FIG. 3 shows simulated function curves of pressure distributions on differently formed strakes which all correspond to the basic form described by means ofFIG. 2 , assuming that the thickness D is always 3 mm, the height H1 is always 1 cm, and the height H2 is always 15 cm. In each case, the simulation is based on a configuration such as those shown inFIGS. 4 to 7 , irrespective of the form of the strake. - The
curves 311 to 313 each correspond to a strake of length L=300 cm, the longitudinal coordinates along thehorizontal axis 304 denoting the distance from the centre of the aerodynamic system of the aircraft. The strake forms an angle of γ=0° with the downward vertical in the case ofcurve 311, an angle of γ=30° in the case ofcurve 312, and an angle of γ=20° in the case ofcurve 312. Along thevertical axis 302, each curve shows the pressure distributions on the strake at the respective longitudinal coordinates, theatmospheric pressure 300 having been marked separately on the bottom. - In the case of
curves 314 to 316, a strake of length L=203 cm has been assumed, which is arranged further towards the back end of the casing, as can be seen from the longitudinal coordinates. The strake forms an angle of γ=0° with the downward vertical in the case ofcurve 314, an angle of γ=20° in the case ofcurve 315, and an angle of γ=40° in the case ofcurve 316. A particularly advantageous pressure distribution is shown bycurve 313, in which the pressure varies gently over the length of the strake and the line of theatmospheric pressure 300 is not crossed, so that the strake and the casing are not exposed to varying pressure and tensile stresses. - A strake of this type can, for example, be produced from a composite material and connected to the outer wall of the casing by means of fastening elements integrated into this wall.
- Although the present invention has presently been described on the basis of preferred embodiments, it is not restricted thereto, but can be modified in many different ways.
- For example, the invention can also be applied to types of lifting aids other than flap track casings, as well as to actual loads, inter alia, which are mounted underneath the aerofoils or in other places which are accessible to the propulsive jet of a jet engine.
- 100 flap track casing
- 101 longitudinal axis of the casing
- 102 flap track
- 104 strake
- 106 outer surface
- 108 vertically downward direction
- 110 transverse profile
- 112 jet engine
- 114 jet
- 116 engine mount casing
- 118 aircraft
- 120 aircraft fuselage
- 200 front end of the strake
- 202 leading edge
- 204 back end of the strake
- 206 trailing edge
- 208 upper edge
- 210 lower edge
- 300 atmospheric pressure
- 302 simulated pressure distribution
- 304 x-coordinates of the aerodynamic system
- 311-316 pressure distribution curve
- 400, 401 landing flap
- 402 aerofoil
- 404 trailing edge of the aerofoil
- 406 back end of the casing
- 410 flux lines
- 412 flux on the side wall
- 414 flux on the floor wall
- D thickness of the strake
- H1 height of the leading edge
- H2 height of the trailing edge
- H3 maximum height
- γ angle to downward vertical
Claims (17)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US15/587,902 US20170305528A1 (en) | 2009-05-13 | 2017-05-05 | Aircraft comprising a casing for a lifting aid |
Applications Claiming Priority (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US17783109P | 2009-05-13 | 2009-05-13 | |
DE102009003084.0 | 2009-05-13 | ||
DE102009003084A DE102009003084B4 (en) | 2009-05-13 | 2009-05-13 | Cladding for a buoyancy aid |
PCT/EP2010/056374 WO2010130690A2 (en) | 2009-05-13 | 2010-05-10 | Casing for a lifting aid |
US13/293,570 US9669920B2 (en) | 2009-05-13 | 2011-11-10 | Casing for a lifting aid |
US15/587,902 US20170305528A1 (en) | 2009-05-13 | 2017-05-05 | Aircraft comprising a casing for a lifting aid |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/293,570 Continuation US9669920B2 (en) | 2009-05-13 | 2011-11-10 | Casing for a lifting aid |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20170305528A1 true US20170305528A1 (en) | 2017-10-26 |
Family
ID=42978900
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/293,570 Active US9669920B2 (en) | 2009-05-13 | 2011-11-10 | Casing for a lifting aid |
US15/587,902 Abandoned US20170305528A1 (en) | 2009-05-13 | 2017-05-05 | Aircraft comprising a casing for a lifting aid |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/293,570 Active US9669920B2 (en) | 2009-05-13 | 2011-11-10 | Casing for a lifting aid |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US9669920B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2429895B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN102438893B (en) |
DE (1) | DE102009003084B4 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2011145806A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010130690A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2982236B1 (en) * | 2011-11-03 | 2014-06-27 | Snecma | HOOK PYLONE FOR TURBOMACHINE |
DE102012111690A1 (en) * | 2012-11-30 | 2014-06-05 | Airbus Operations Gmbh | A variable-shape aerodynamic fairing body for a flap adjustment mechanism of an aircraft |
FR3045012B1 (en) * | 2015-12-11 | 2017-12-08 | Airbus Operations Sas | TURBOMACHINE ATTACHING MAT WITH THERMAL PROTECTION ELEMENT |
US10723445B2 (en) | 2017-05-16 | 2020-07-28 | Rohr, Inc. | Strake for aircraft propulsion system nacelle |
US20190225318A1 (en) * | 2018-01-25 | 2019-07-25 | General Electric Company | Aircraft systems and methods |
RU2752502C1 (en) * | 2020-12-18 | 2021-07-28 | Акционерное общество "Национальный центр вертолетостроения им. М.Л. Миля и Н.И. Камова" (АО "НЦВ Миль и Камов") | Aerodynamic profile of the aircraft carrier element |
RU2762464C1 (en) * | 2021-05-14 | 2021-12-21 | Акционерное общество "Национальный центр вертолетостроения им. М.Л. Миля и Н.И. Камова" (АО "НЦВ Миль и Камов") | Aerodynamic profile of the aircraft carrier |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3960345A (en) * | 1975-05-16 | 1976-06-01 | Grumman Aerospace Corporation | Means to reduce and/or eliminate vortices, caused by wing body combinations |
US4540143A (en) * | 1983-08-04 | 1985-09-10 | The Boeing Company | Nacelle/wing assembly with wake control device |
US4685643A (en) * | 1983-08-04 | 1987-08-11 | The Boeing Company | Nacelle/wing assembly with vortex control device |
US4712750A (en) * | 1986-05-02 | 1987-12-15 | The Boeing Company | Temperature control device for jet engine nacelle associated structure |
US5069402A (en) * | 1990-04-06 | 1991-12-03 | Istar, Inc. | Alleviation of aircraft fuselage form drag |
US7334760B1 (en) * | 2003-01-03 | 2008-02-26 | Orbital Research Inc. | Flow control device and method of controlling flow |
US20080067292A1 (en) * | 2006-09-18 | 2008-03-20 | Airbus France | Vortex generator at hot gas output |
US20090261198A1 (en) * | 2008-04-21 | 2009-10-22 | Airbus France | Pylon for suspending a turboengine |
US8087617B2 (en) * | 2008-08-15 | 2012-01-03 | The Boeing Company | Retractable nacelle chine |
Family Cites Families (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3578264A (en) * | 1968-07-09 | 1971-05-11 | Battelle Development Corp | Boundary layer control of flow separation and heat exchange |
US3744745A (en) * | 1971-09-30 | 1973-07-10 | Mc Donnell Douglas Corp | Liftvanes |
US4019696A (en) * | 1973-12-28 | 1977-04-26 | The Boeing Company | Method of and apparatus for enhancing Coanda flow attachment over a wing and flap surface |
US4354648A (en) * | 1980-02-06 | 1982-10-19 | Gates Learjet Corporation | Airstream modification device for airfoils |
US4466587A (en) * | 1981-12-21 | 1984-08-21 | General Electric Company | Nacelle installation |
AU555526B2 (en) | 1982-10-29 | 1986-09-25 | General Electric Company | Aircraft engine nacelle |
DE3641247A1 (en) * | 1986-12-03 | 1988-06-16 | Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm | LANDING VALVE GUIDE RAIL FAIRING FOR AIRCRAFT |
JP3714722B2 (en) * | 1996-05-09 | 2005-11-09 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | Peeling suppression device |
US6964397B2 (en) * | 2003-07-18 | 2005-11-15 | The Boeing Company | Nacelle chine installation for drag reduction |
EP1627811B1 (en) * | 2004-08-20 | 2011-10-12 | The Boeing Company | Nacelle chine installation for drag reduction |
FR2891525B1 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2007-11-09 | Airbus France Sas | DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING A TOURBILLONARY WAKE GENERATED BY AN OBLONG ELEMENT ON THE EXTRADOS OF A CARRYING SURFACE OF AN AIRCRAFT. |
RU72198U1 (en) | 2007-02-20 | 2008-04-10 | Владимир Тарасович Шведов | AIRCRAFT WITH HIGH AERODYNAMIC QUALITY |
-
2009
- 2009-05-13 DE DE102009003084A patent/DE102009003084B4/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2010
- 2010-05-10 WO PCT/EP2010/056374 patent/WO2010130690A2/en active Application Filing
- 2010-05-10 EP EP10719337.7A patent/EP2429895B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2010-05-10 CN CN201080021131.8A patent/CN102438893B/en active Active
- 2010-05-10 RU RU2011145806/11A patent/RU2011145806A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2011
- 2011-11-10 US US13/293,570 patent/US9669920B2/en active Active
-
2017
- 2017-05-05 US US15/587,902 patent/US20170305528A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3960345A (en) * | 1975-05-16 | 1976-06-01 | Grumman Aerospace Corporation | Means to reduce and/or eliminate vortices, caused by wing body combinations |
US4540143A (en) * | 1983-08-04 | 1985-09-10 | The Boeing Company | Nacelle/wing assembly with wake control device |
US4685643A (en) * | 1983-08-04 | 1987-08-11 | The Boeing Company | Nacelle/wing assembly with vortex control device |
US4712750A (en) * | 1986-05-02 | 1987-12-15 | The Boeing Company | Temperature control device for jet engine nacelle associated structure |
US5069402A (en) * | 1990-04-06 | 1991-12-03 | Istar, Inc. | Alleviation of aircraft fuselage form drag |
US7334760B1 (en) * | 2003-01-03 | 2008-02-26 | Orbital Research Inc. | Flow control device and method of controlling flow |
US20080067292A1 (en) * | 2006-09-18 | 2008-03-20 | Airbus France | Vortex generator at hot gas output |
US20090261198A1 (en) * | 2008-04-21 | 2009-10-22 | Airbus France | Pylon for suspending a turboengine |
US8087617B2 (en) * | 2008-08-15 | 2012-01-03 | The Boeing Company | Retractable nacelle chine |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE102009003084B4 (en) | 2013-03-14 |
RU2011145806A (en) | 2013-05-20 |
EP2429895A2 (en) | 2012-03-21 |
WO2010130690A3 (en) | 2011-04-28 |
EP2429895B1 (en) | 2013-04-17 |
DE102009003084A1 (en) | 2010-11-18 |
US20120112011A1 (en) | 2012-05-10 |
US9669920B2 (en) | 2017-06-06 |
CN102438893A (en) | 2012-05-02 |
WO2010130690A2 (en) | 2010-11-18 |
CN102438893B (en) | 2014-12-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20170305528A1 (en) | Aircraft comprising a casing for a lifting aid | |
CN101687542B (en) | Engine nacelle of an aircraft comprising a vortex generator arrangement | |
EP2214958B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for enhancing engine-powered lift in an aircraft | |
US8186617B2 (en) | Aircraft having a lambda-box wing configuration | |
US20060186261A1 (en) | Vertical take-off and landing aircraft | |
US20090084904A1 (en) | Wingtip Feathers, Including Paired, Fixed Feathers, and Associated Systems and Methods | |
US9272772B2 (en) | Surface element for an aircraft, aircraft and method for improving high-lift generation on a surface element | |
US10384766B2 (en) | Aircraft wing roughness strip and method | |
US20060060720A1 (en) | Methods and systems for controlling lower surface shocks | |
US8146868B2 (en) | Pylon for suspending a turboengine | |
US6964397B2 (en) | Nacelle chine installation for drag reduction | |
US20090230251A1 (en) | Airplane engine pylon comprising at least one protruding element to generate a vortex of the airflow | |
EP3205581A1 (en) | Aircraft and empennage section of an aircraft | |
JP7072411B2 (en) | Aircraft radome equipment and methods | |
US6959896B2 (en) | Passive aerodynamic sonic boom suppression for supersonic aircraft | |
EP0995675B1 (en) | Method for reducing wave resistance in airplane | |
US6308913B1 (en) | Method for reducing wave resistance in airplane | |
CN106828933B (en) | A kind of high altitude long time tandem rotor aircraft aerodynamic arrangement using upper inverted diherdral difference | |
US8167249B1 (en) | Controllable upper surface blown nozzle | |
CN103612746A (en) | Fairing structure for pylon of aircraft with wing-mounted layout | |
WO2020040671A1 (en) | Methods for improvements of the closed wing aircraft concept and corresponding aircraft configurations | |
US8740139B1 (en) | Leading edge snag for exposed propeller engine installation | |
US20190256188A1 (en) | Airfoil Modification To Improve Fuel Efficiency | |
WO2007104940A1 (en) | Aircraft | |
Kentfield | Drag reductions possible with aircraft employing outboard horizontal stabilizers |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH, GERMANY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EMUNDS, ROLF;REEL/FRAME:042967/0941 Effective date: 20170524 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |