US20100059624A1 - Aircraft comprising a device for reducing the induced drag - Google Patents

Aircraft comprising a device for reducing the induced drag Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100059624A1
US20100059624A1 US12/299,621 US29962107A US2010059624A1 US 20100059624 A1 US20100059624 A1 US 20100059624A1 US 29962107 A US29962107 A US 29962107A US 2010059624 A1 US2010059624 A1 US 2010059624A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
engine support
aircraft
aircraft according
pylon
fixed
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US12/299,621
Other versions
US8167248B2 (en
Inventor
Thierry FOL
Majorie Defos
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Airbus Operations SAS
Original Assignee
Airbus Operations SAS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Airbus Operations SAS filed Critical Airbus Operations SAS
Assigned to AIRBUS FRANCE reassignment AIRBUS FRANCE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DEFOS, MARJORIE, FOL, THIERRY
Publication of US20100059624A1 publication Critical patent/US20100059624A1/en
Assigned to AIRBUS OPERATIONS SAS reassignment AIRBUS OPERATIONS SAS MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: AIRBUS FRANCE
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8167248B2 publication Critical patent/US8167248B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C1/00Fuselages; Constructional features common to fuselages, wings, stabilising surfaces or the like
    • B64C1/14Windows; Doors; Hatch covers or access panels; Surrounding frame structures; Canopies; Windscreens accessories therefor, e.g. pressure sensors, water deflectors, hinges, seals, handles, latches, windscreen wipers
    • B64C1/1407Doors; surrounding frames
    • B64C1/1453Drain masts
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C23/00Influencing air flow over aircraft surfaces, not otherwise provided for
    • B64C23/06Influencing air flow over aircraft surfaces, not otherwise provided for by generating vortices
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C7/00Structures or fairings not otherwise provided for
    • B64C7/02Nacelles
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64DEQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLIGHT SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENTS OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
    • B64D29/00Power-plant nacelles, fairings, or cowlings
    • B64D29/02Power-plant nacelles, fairings, or cowlings associated with wings
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T50/00Aeronautics or air transport
    • Y02T50/10Drag reduction

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a device making it possible to reduce the aerodynamic drag of an aircraft.
  • the main objective of the present invention is precisely to reduce the aerodynamic drag of an aircraft.
  • the invention relates to an aircraft equipped with a longitudinal fuselage, at least two side wings connected symmetrically to opposite sides of the fuselage and at least one engine nacelle fixed to each side wing by way of an engine support pylon.
  • At least one profiled lifting member is disposed on each of the engine support pylons, in such a way as to generate a propulsive resultant force under the action of an oblique air flow.
  • This member is subjected to a high-intensity local air flow created by the interaction of the fuselage and of the main wing unit with the longitudinal air flow upstream from the aircraft.
  • the direction of this flow is not aligned with the longitudinal general direction of the air flow upstream from the aircraft, but is oriented obliquely relative thereto.
  • the lifting force that develops on this member is oriented perpendicular to the oblique local flow direction. This lifting force is oriented to a major extent in the direction of the tip of the main wing unit and to a minor extent toward the front of the aircraft. Such a force projected onto the line of flight of the aircraft induces a resultant force of propulsion.
  • the said at least one member extends from an end fixed to the engine support pylon, departing from the said end in an extension direction inclined by at least 30° relative to the top surface of the side wing in question.
  • the inclination of the extension direction of the member is not necessarily vertical)(90°, but it must not be too close to horizontal, because then the member can no longer use the air flow that is oblique relative to the longitudinal direction of the air flow to generate a lifting force.
  • the said at least one member is disposed on or close to the crest line of the engine support pylon.
  • the member By disposing the member in this manner, it can recover part of the energy contained in the transverse air flow.
  • the said at least one member is disposed along the longitudinal direction of the engine support pylon at a distance, from the part of the pylon fixed to the side wing, of between 10% and 70% of the local chord of the wing unit.
  • the member By disposing the member at such a distance from the wing unit, the member is then able to recover the energy of oblique flows. In fact, if the member were placed too close to the wing unit, a detrimental interaction with the flow of the leading edge of the wing unit would be produced.
  • the said at least one member possesses a wetted area and an extension dimension or height, measured from one end of the said member fixed to the engine support pylon, the wetted area and the height being in an area-to-height ratio of between 1 and 4.
  • the said at least one member possesses a wetted area that is adjusted as a function of the gain in desired drag reduction and of the general dimensions of the aircraft.
  • the said at least one member possesses an end said to be free opposite an end fixed to the engine support pylon, the free end being oriented toward downstream relative to the upstream position of the fixed end, thus conferring on the member an inclination toward downstream in longitudinal direction.
  • the free end of the member may be disposed substantially vertically in the end of the member which is fixed to the support pylon. Nevertheless, when the aircraft is flying at transonic speeds, it is preferable to incline the free end of the member toward downstream in order to limit supersonic phenomena.
  • the said at least one member has the shape of a fin, which imparts an aerodynamic profile to the member.
  • the said at least one member is provided with a wall defining an internal duct for evacuation of a fluid flow, the said duct communicating, at one end, with the interior of the engine support pylon from which the fluid flow originates and, at a distance from that end, with at least one aperture implemented in the wall of the member and discharging to the outside of the said member.
  • Such an arrangement makes it possible, for example, to drain, by way of the member, an air flow internal to the reactor support pylon toward the outside of the latter.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic general view in perspective showing the installation of a lifting member according to the invention relative to the fuselage and to the wing unit of an aircraft;
  • FIG. 2 is an enlarged schematic view in perspective of the member of FIG. 1 , seen from the aircraft fuselage;
  • FIG. 3 is an enlarged schematic view from above of the member of FIG. 2 and of the forces involved;
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic front view of the member of FIGS. 1 and 2 ;
  • FIG. 5 is an alternative embodiment showing the member of FIG. 4 in a different angular orientation
  • FIGS. 6 and 7 are schematic views of the member according to an alternative embodiment showing an internal duct for evacuation of flow, and apertures.
  • an aircraft 10 is equipped with a fuselage 12 , to which are joined two side wings, disposed symmetrically on opposite sides of the fuselage.
  • An engine nacelle 16 is fixed to wing 14 by way of an engine support pylon 18 .
  • Support pylon 18 is itself fixed under wing 14 in traditional manner, which is not represented and will not be described in further detail here.
  • each side wing may be provided on each side wing.
  • a lifting member 20 is disposed on engine support pylon 18 .
  • This member is profiled, for example in the manner of a wing unit of small size, in order to avoid generating too much inherent drag.
  • member 20 has the shape of a fin.
  • This lifting member is effectively similar to that of a wing of an airplane that would fly at the local mean speed of the location at which the lifting member is installed on pylon 18 .
  • the arrow denoted by 22 represents the direction of one of these oblique flows, also known as cross flows.
  • This lifting force has a significant longitudinal component 26 , which represents a resultant force of propulsion that contributes to reducing the total aerodynamic drag of the aircraft.
  • lifting member 20 is disposed longitudinally along the crest of reactor support pylon 18 at a distance, on the one hand, from the part of the pylon fixed to wing unit 14 and, on the other hand, from the part of the pylon fixed to nacelle 16 .
  • the member is disposed upstream from the leading edge of the wing unit, at a distance of between 10% and 70% of the chord of the wing unit.
  • the member not be too close to the wing unit, to ensure that its interactions with the leading edge are not detrimental.
  • member 20 is positioned on the engine support pylon at the location where the side slip, or in other words the difference between the local oblique flow and the flow upstream from the airplane (longitudinal flow), is maximal.
  • lifting member 20 has two opposite ends, an end 20 a , serving as the base, which is fixed to the engine support pylon ( FIG. 2 ), and a free end 20 b at a distance from the said base end.
  • the member therefore extends in an extension direction, also known as height, which, in the example represented in FIG. 4 (front view of the nacelle; the arrow indicates the direction of the fuselage), is substantially perpendicular to the substantially horizontal top surface (extrados) of wing unit 14 .
  • extension direction of lifting member 20 may be inclined relative to the top surface of the wing unit by an angle of inclination that is not necessarily equal to 90° but is at least equal to 30°.
  • FIG. 5 An angle of inclination of 90° is represented in FIG. 5 (front view of the nacelle; the arrow indicates the direction of the fuselage).
  • the lifting member may adopt such an inclination when it is fixed on the crest line of reactor support pylon 18 and also when it is disposed close to this crest line.
  • wetted area of lifting member 20 is adjusted as a function of the desired gain in reduction of the aerodynamic drag of the airplane and also of the general dimensions of the aircraft.
  • the rules for imparting twist and camber to the profiles constituting the lifting member are determined as a function of the evolution, along the leading edge of the lifting member, on the one hand of the side slip measured in the global aerodynamic coordinate system of the airplane, and on the other hand of the desired aerodynamic load on this member.
  • each transverse section of the member taken perpendicular to the height thereof, is defined as a function of the local oblique flow.
  • the ratio between the external area of the member and its height is generally between 1 and 4 (this value depends on the general dimensions of the airplane) in order to obtain a good compromise between the lifting force, generated when the local oblique flow encounters the member and which must be maximal, and the induced local inherent drag, which is sought to be reduced.
  • the wetted area is 4 m 2 and the height of the member is 1 m, thus giving a ratio of 4.
  • the angular position of the member is adjusted by rotation around a vertical axis, along which its height is defined.
  • the member is adjusted relative to an axis that is globally perpendicular to the profiles constituting the member, meaning that the position of the latter is regulated relative to an oblique local flow in order that one of the lifting surfaces of the member will be impinged on optimally by the flow.
  • the presence of the said member may improve the flow of air over the wing unit.
  • the compression effects induced downstream from the trailing edge of the lifting member in fact may be used to retard the compressibility of the main wing unit.
  • free end 20 b of the member is not necessarily placed vertically in end 20 a .
  • End 20 b in fact can be displaced in longitudinal direction (fuselage axis), toward downstream, such that it is located downstream relative to the upstream position of end 20 a fixed to engine support pylon 18 .
  • member 20 has an inclination toward downstream, which is particularly useful to it in limiting the inherent local drag generated by the member at transonic speeds, or in other words at local Mach numbers higher than 0.6.
  • member 30 in one alternative embodiment has an internal duct 32 defining a passage for an air flow originating in the interior of engine support pylon 18 .
  • the internal flow of support pylon 18 originates, for example, from the cold port of an internal air-conditioning system of the engine.
  • member 30 is beneficial as regards evacuating this flow originating from the pylon.
  • member 30 is provided with a wall whose external surface defines the external shape of the member and whose internal surface defines the internal duct for evacuating fluid flow.
  • this duct communicates at one end 32 a with the internal part of engine support pylon 18 and, by means of its opposite end 32 b , extends into pylon 18 and along the member in the direction of free end 30 b thereof.
  • One or more discharge apertures are implemented in the wall of the member at one or more locations thereof, in order to permit the flow circulating in the duct to be evacuated toward the outside.
  • profile 30 c of the wall of the lifting member has been represented in cross section, as has the profile of this wall at the base of the member, which base coincides with its end 30 a.
  • apertures can be implemented in regular or irregular manner along the wall of the member.
  • the aperture or apertures may be arranged at or close to free end 30 b of the member.
  • End 32 b of the duct itself constitutes an aperture.
  • the apertures have a passage cross section of between 0.1 and 2 dm 2 , depending on the aircraft.

Abstract

An aircraft including a longitudinal fuselage, at least two lateral wings connected symmetrically one on each side of the fuselage and at least one engine pod fixed to each lateral wing via an engine support pylon. At least one profiled bearing rod is positioned on each of the engine support pylons so as to generate a propulsive resultant force under action of an oblique air flow.

Description

  • The invention relates to a device making it possible to reduce the aerodynamic drag of an aircraft.
  • For various reasons, especially to achieve fuel savings, there is an ongoing effort to reduce the aerodynamic drag on aircraft during cruising flight.
  • The main objective of the present invention is precisely to reduce the aerodynamic drag of an aircraft.
  • To this end, the invention relates to an aircraft equipped with a longitudinal fuselage, at least two side wings connected symmetrically to opposite sides of the fuselage and at least one engine nacelle fixed to each side wing by way of an engine support pylon.
  • According to the invention, at least one profiled lifting member is disposed on each of the engine support pylons, in such a way as to generate a propulsive resultant force under the action of an oblique air flow.
  • This member is subjected to a high-intensity local air flow created by the interaction of the fuselage and of the main wing unit with the longitudinal air flow upstream from the aircraft. The direction of this flow is not aligned with the longitudinal general direction of the air flow upstream from the aircraft, but is oriented obliquely relative thereto. The lifting force that develops on this member is oriented perpendicular to the oblique local flow direction. This lifting force is oriented to a major extent in the direction of the tip of the main wing unit and to a minor extent toward the front of the aircraft. Such a force projected onto the line of flight of the aircraft induces a resultant force of propulsion.
  • It will be noted that local drag forces are generated by the member.
  • However, the contribution of these local forces to the resultant drag of the aircraft is largely compensated by the resultant force of propulsion induced by the projection of the lift of the member onto the axis of the resultant drag of the aircraft.
  • According to one characteristic, the said at least one member extends from an end fixed to the engine support pylon, departing from the said end in an extension direction inclined by at least 30° relative to the top surface of the side wing in question.
  • The inclination of the extension direction of the member is not necessarily vertical)(90°, but it must not be too close to horizontal, because then the member can no longer use the air flow that is oblique relative to the longitudinal direction of the air flow to generate a lifting force.
  • According to one characteristic, the said at least one member is disposed on or close to the crest line of the engine support pylon.
  • By disposing the member in this manner, it can recover part of the energy contained in the transverse air flow.
  • According to one characteristic, the said at least one member is disposed along the longitudinal direction of the engine support pylon at a distance, from the part of the pylon fixed to the side wing, of between 10% and 70% of the local chord of the wing unit.
  • By disposing the member at such a distance from the wing unit, the member is then able to recover the energy of oblique flows. In fact, if the member were placed too close to the wing unit, a detrimental interaction with the flow of the leading edge of the wing unit would be produced.
  • According to one characteristic, the said at least one member possesses a wetted area and an extension dimension or height, measured from one end of the said member fixed to the engine support pylon, the wetted area and the height being in an area-to-height ratio of between 1 and 4.
  • In fact, an excessively large wetted area of the member would generate very satisfactory lifting force but too much inherent drag.
  • It will be noted that by increasing the height of the member, for constant area, the inherent drag generated by the said member is reduced.
  • Thus, by appropriately adapting the area and height of the member, there is achieved a good compromise between the obtained lifting force, which one wishes to favor, and the inherent drag generated by the member, which one seeks to minimize.
  • According to one characteristic, the said at least one member possesses a wetted area that is adjusted as a function of the gain in desired drag reduction and of the general dimensions of the aircraft.
  • According to another characteristic, the said at least one member possesses an end said to be free opposite an end fixed to the engine support pylon, the free end being oriented toward downstream relative to the upstream position of the fixed end, thus conferring on the member an inclination toward downstream in longitudinal direction.
  • It will be noted that, for aircraft speeds on the order of Mach 0.4 or Mach 0.5, the free end of the member may be disposed substantially vertically in the end of the member which is fixed to the support pylon. Nevertheless, when the aircraft is flying at transonic speeds, it is preferable to incline the free end of the member toward downstream in order to limit supersonic phenomena.
  • In this way the drag generated by the member at transonic speeds is limited.
  • According to one characteristic, the said at least one member has the shape of a fin, which imparts an aerodynamic profile to the member.
  • According to one characteristic, the said at least one member is provided with a wall defining an internal duct for evacuation of a fluid flow, the said duct communicating, at one end, with the interior of the engine support pylon from which the fluid flow originates and, at a distance from that end, with at least one aperture implemented in the wall of the member and discharging to the outside of the said member.
  • Such an arrangement makes it possible, for example, to drain, by way of the member, an air flow internal to the reactor support pylon toward the outside of the latter.
  • Other characteristics and advantages will become apparent in the course of the description hereinafter, given only by way of non-limitative example, written with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic general view in perspective showing the installation of a lifting member according to the invention relative to the fuselage and to the wing unit of an aircraft;
  • FIG. 2 is an enlarged schematic view in perspective of the member of FIG. 1, seen from the aircraft fuselage;
  • FIG. 3 is an enlarged schematic view from above of the member of FIG. 2 and of the forces involved;
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic front view of the member of FIGS. 1 and 2;
  • FIG. 5 is an alternative embodiment showing the member of FIG. 4 in a different angular orientation;
  • FIGS. 6 and 7 are schematic views of the member according to an alternative embodiment showing an internal duct for evacuation of flow, and apertures.
  • As represented in FIG. 1 and designated by the general reference 10, an aircraft 10 is equipped with a fuselage 12, to which are joined two side wings, disposed symmetrically on opposite sides of the fuselage.
  • Only one of the side wings 14 is represented in FIG. 1.
  • An engine nacelle 16 is fixed to wing 14 by way of an engine support pylon 18.
  • Support pylon 18 is itself fixed under wing 14 in traditional manner, which is not represented and will not be described in further detail here.
  • The aforesaid arrangement composed of engine nacelle 16 and support pylon 18 is also provided in identical manner on the other side wing not represented in this figure.
  • It will be noted that, depending on the type of aircraft, a plurality of such arrangements may be provided on each side wing.
  • As represented in FIGS. 1 and 2, a lifting member 20 is disposed on engine support pylon 18.
  • This member is profiled, for example in the manner of a wing unit of small size, in order to avoid generating too much inherent drag.
  • In the example represented in FIGS. 1 and 2, member 20 has the shape of a fin.
  • The shape of this lifting member is effectively similar to that of a wing of an airplane that would fly at the local mean speed of the location at which the lifting member is installed on pylon 18.
  • As represented in FIG. 3, when the aircraft is in cruising flight, the total air flow that the aircraft encounters has a longitudinal direction F. Upon contact of the aircraft with this flow, there are formed local flows that are oblique, or in other words non-longitudinal, and that contribute to reducing the total drag of the aircraft by virtue of the invention.
  • In FIG. 3, the arrow denoted by 22 represents the direction of one of these oblique flows, also known as cross flows.
  • When this oblique local flow encounters lifting member 20, an aerodynamic force 24 is developed by the said member, perpendicular to the direction of the oblique local flow.
  • This lifting force has a significant longitudinal component 26, which represents a resultant force of propulsion that contributes to reducing the total aerodynamic drag of the aircraft.
  • Although the encounter between the oblique local flow and lifting member 20 also generates local drag forces inherent to this member (these parasitic forces are not represented in the figure), they are largely compensated by the longitudinal component of the generated resultant force 24 of propulsion.
  • Furthermore, as will be seen hereinafter, these local drag forces can also be reduced.
  • As represented in FIGS. 1 and 2, lifting member 20 is disposed longitudinally along the crest of reactor support pylon 18 at a distance, on the one hand, from the part of the pylon fixed to wing unit 14 and, on the other hand, from the part of the pylon fixed to nacelle 16.
  • More particularly, the member is disposed upstream from the leading edge of the wing unit, at a distance of between 10% and 70% of the chord of the wing unit.
  • It is important, in fact, that the member not be too close to the wing unit, to ensure that its interactions with the leading edge are not detrimental.
  • Furthermore, an arrangement of lifting member 20 too close to the part of support pylon 18 joined to nacelle 16, it would entail the risk of no longer benefiting from sufficiently intense oblique flows.
  • For example, member 20 is positioned on the engine support pylon at the location where the side slip, or in other words the difference between the local oblique flow and the flow upstream from the airplane (longitudinal flow), is maximal.
  • More particularly, lifting member 20 has two opposite ends, an end 20 a, serving as the base, which is fixed to the engine support pylon (FIG. 2), and a free end 20 b at a distance from the said base end.
  • The member therefore extends in an extension direction, also known as height, which, in the example represented in FIG. 4 (front view of the nacelle; the arrow indicates the direction of the fuselage), is substantially perpendicular to the substantially horizontal top surface (extrados) of wing unit 14.
  • It will be noted, nevertheless, that the extension direction of lifting member 20, represented in a vertical position in FIGS. 1 and 2, may be inclined relative to the top surface of the wing unit by an angle of inclination that is not necessarily equal to 90° but is at least equal to 30°.
  • An angle of inclination of 90° is represented in FIG. 5 (front view of the nacelle; the arrow indicates the direction of the fuselage).
  • In fact, such an angle of inclination of the member makes it even more possible for this member to generate sufficient lifting force to reduce the total aerodynamic drag of the aircraft significantly when the member encounters a local oblique flow.
  • It also should be noted that the lifting member may adopt such an inclination when it is fixed on the crest line of reactor support pylon 18 and also when it is disposed close to this crest line.
  • It will be noted that the wetted area of lifting member 20 is adjusted as a function of the desired gain in reduction of the aerodynamic drag of the airplane and also of the general dimensions of the aircraft.
  • In proportioning the lifting member, it is sought to create the maximum lift with the minimum area, in order that the lifting member will not generate too much inherent drag.
  • It will be noted that the rules for imparting twist and camber to the profiles constituting the lifting member are determined as a function of the evolution, along the leading edge of the lifting member, on the one hand of the side slip measured in the global aerodynamic coordinate system of the airplane, and on the other hand of the desired aerodynamic load on this member.
  • More particularly, the profile of each transverse section of the member, taken perpendicular to the height thereof, is defined as a function of the local oblique flow.
  • It will be noted that the proportioning of the member undergoes an adjustment of the dimension of extension or height of the member and of its wetted area.
  • Thus the ratio between the external area of the member and its height is generally between 1 and 4 (this value depends on the general dimensions of the airplane) in order to obtain a good compromise between the lifting force, generated when the local oblique flow encounters the member and which must be maximal, and the induced local inherent drag, which is sought to be reduced.
  • By way of example, the wetted area is 4 m2 and the height of the member is 1 m, thus giving a ratio of 4.
  • Furthermore, in order to obtain the best possible lifting force for member 20, the angular position of the member is adjusted by rotation around a vertical axis, along which its height is defined.
  • In this way the member is adjusted relative to an axis that is globally perpendicular to the profiles constituting the member, meaning that the position of the latter is regulated relative to an oblique local flow in order that one of the lifting surfaces of the member will be impinged on optimally by the flow.
  • In this way it is possible to obtain the maximum aerodynamic efficiency, or in other words the maximum ratio between lift and drag.
  • It should be noted that, depending on the pressure field that develops over the member, or in other words as a function of the characteristics of the flow enveloping the airplane, the presence of the said member may improve the flow of air over the wing unit.
  • Under certain circumstances, the compression effects induced downstream from the trailing edge of the lifting member in fact may be used to retard the compressibility of the main wing unit.
  • Thus the profiles of the wing unit that are situated downstream from the lifting member are subjected to speeds lower than those that would exist in the absence of the member.
  • As represented in the exemplary embodiment of FIGS. 1 and 2, free end 20 b of the member is not necessarily placed vertically in end 20 a. End 20 b in fact can be displaced in longitudinal direction (fuselage axis), toward downstream, such that it is located downstream relative to the upstream position of end 20 a fixed to engine support pylon 18.
  • Thus member 20 has an inclination toward downstream, which is particularly useful to it in limiting the inherent local drag generated by the member at transonic speeds, or in other words at local Mach numbers higher than 0.6.
  • As represented in FIG. 6 (partial view in section of the pylon in its environment), member 30 in one alternative embodiment has an internal duct 32 defining a passage for an air flow originating in the interior of engine support pylon 18.
  • More particularly, the internal flow of support pylon 18 originates, for example, from the cold port of an internal air-conditioning system of the engine.
  • In this way the presence of member 30 is beneficial as regards evacuating this flow originating from the pylon.
  • More particularly, member 30 is provided with a wall whose external surface defines the external shape of the member and whose internal surface defines the internal duct for evacuating fluid flow.
  • As represented in FIG. 6, this duct communicates at one end 32 a with the internal part of engine support pylon 18 and, by means of its opposite end 32 b, extends into pylon 18 and along the member in the direction of free end 30 b thereof.
  • One or more discharge apertures, such as aperture 34 in enlarged section A-A of FIG. 7, are implemented in the wall of the member at one or more locations thereof, in order to permit the flow circulating in the duct to be evacuated toward the outside.
  • In FIG. 7, profile 30 c of the wall of the lifting member has been represented in cross section, as has the profile of this wall at the base of the member, which base coincides with its end 30 a.
  • It will be noted that the apertures can be implemented in regular or irregular manner along the wall of the member.
  • They are arranged on that face of the member which is opposite to the face receiving the oblique flow (face turned upward in FIG. 3).
  • Alternatively, the aperture or apertures may be arranged at or close to free end 30 b of the member.
  • End 32 b of the duct itself constitutes an aperture.
  • It will be noted that the apertures have a passage cross section of between 0.1 and 2 dm2, depending on the aircraft.
  • It will also be noted that the two possibilities may be combined, namely apertures implemented along the wall of the member and this as far as the free end thereof.

Claims (10)

1-9. (canceled)
10. An aircraft comprising:
a longitudinal fuselage;
at least two side wings connected symmetrically to opposite sides of the fuselage;
at least one engine nacelle fixed to each side wing by an engine support pylon; and
at least one profiled lifting member disposed on each of the engine support pylons, so as to generate a propulsive resultant force under action of an oblique air flow.
11. An aircraft according to claim 10, wherein the at least one member extends from an end fixed to the engine support pylon, departing from the end in an extension direction inclined by at least 30° relative to the top surface of the side wing in question.
12. An aircraft according to claim 10, wherein the at least one member is disposed on or close to a crest line of the engine support pylon.
13. An aircraft according to claim 10, wherein the at least one member is disposed along the longitudinal direction of the engine support pylon at a distance, from a part of the pylon fixed to the side wing, of between 10% and 70% of a local chord of a wing unit.
14. An aircraft according to claim 10, wherein the at least one member includes a wetted area and an extension dimension or height, measured from one end of the member fixed to the engine support pylon, the wetted area and the height being in an area-to-height ratio of between 1 and 4.
15. An aircraft according to claim 10, wherein the at least one member includes a wetted area that is adjusted as a function of gain in desired drag reduction and of general dimensions of the aircraft.
16. An aircraft according to claim 10, wherein the at least one member includes a free end opposite an end fixed to the engine support pylon, the free end being oriented toward downstream relative to an upstream position of the fixed end, thus conferring on the member an inclination toward downstream in longitudinal direction.
17. An aircraft according to claim 10, wherein the at least one member has a shape of a fin.
18. An aircraft according to claim 10, wherein the at least one member includes a wall defining an internal duct for evacuation of a fluid flow, the duct communicating, at one end, with an interior of the engine support pylon from which the fluid flow originates and, at a distance from that end, with at least one aperture implemented in the wall of the member and discharging to the outside of the member.
US12/299,621 2006-05-23 2007-05-11 Aircraft comprising a device for reducing the induced drag Active 2029-02-21 US8167248B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR0604629 2006-05-23
FR0604629A FR2901538B1 (en) 2006-05-23 2006-05-23 AIRCRAFT COMPRISING A DEVICE FOR REDUCING INDUCED TRAINING
PCT/FR2007/000806 WO2007135270A1 (en) 2006-05-23 2007-05-11 Aircraft comprising a device for reducing the induced drag

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100059624A1 true US20100059624A1 (en) 2010-03-11
US8167248B2 US8167248B2 (en) 2012-05-01

Family

ID=37613888

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/299,621 Active 2029-02-21 US8167248B2 (en) 2006-05-23 2007-05-11 Aircraft comprising a device for reducing the induced drag

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (1) US8167248B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2019776B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5313884B2 (en)
CN (1) CN101448701B (en)
AT (1) ATE486009T1 (en)
BR (1) BRPI0710386A2 (en)
CA (1) CA2650194C (en)
DE (1) DE602007010125D1 (en)
FR (1) FR2901538B1 (en)
RU (1) RU2437800C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2007135270A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090078830A1 (en) * 2005-11-08 2009-03-26 Airbus France Aircraft comprising a central fairing that adjusts the pressure on the wing structures by means of local geometric deformations
EP2402251A3 (en) * 2010-07-01 2015-08-05 Rolls-Royce plc A jet engine installation

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2998218A1 (en) * 2014-09-16 2016-03-23 Airbus Operations GmbH A wing for an aircraft, and an aircraft comprising such a wing
GB2578447A (en) * 2018-10-26 2020-05-13 Airbus Operations Ltd Aircraft assembly with a hot-air exhaust outlet

Citations (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3744745A (en) * 1971-09-30 1973-07-10 Mc Donnell Douglas Corp Liftvanes
US3920203A (en) * 1974-12-23 1975-11-18 Boeing Co Thrust control apparatus for obtaining maximum thrust reversal in minimum time upon landing of an aircraft
US3968946A (en) * 1975-03-31 1976-07-13 The Boeing Company Extendable aerodynamic fairing
US4019696A (en) * 1973-12-28 1977-04-26 The Boeing Company Method of and apparatus for enhancing Coanda flow attachment over a wing and flap surface
US4314681A (en) * 1979-08-31 1982-02-09 General Electric Company Drag-reducing component
US4466587A (en) * 1981-12-21 1984-08-21 General Electric Company Nacelle installation
US4540143A (en) * 1983-08-04 1985-09-10 The Boeing Company Nacelle/wing assembly with wake control device
US4643376A (en) * 1982-09-30 1987-02-17 The Boeing Company Shock inducing pod for causing flow separation
US4685643A (en) * 1983-08-04 1987-08-11 The Boeing Company Nacelle/wing assembly with vortex control device
US4884772A (en) * 1986-07-28 1989-12-05 The Boeing Company Cantilevered vortex control device
US5443230A (en) * 1993-12-21 1995-08-22 United Technologies Corporation Aircraft wing/nacelle combination
US6116015A (en) * 1998-03-06 2000-09-12 Rolls-Royce Plc Breather outlet
US20050011993A1 (en) * 2003-07-18 2005-01-20 Konings Christopher A. Nacelle chine installation for drag reduction
US20050274846A1 (en) * 2004-06-15 2005-12-15 Roy Dun Methods and apparatuses for controlling airflow proximate to engine/airfoil systems
US20080006738A1 (en) * 2005-10-28 2008-01-10 The Boeing Company Aircraft engine structure-mounted aim-point biasing infrared countermeasure apparatus and method
US20090230251A1 (en) * 2008-03-14 2009-09-17 Airbus France Airplane engine pylon comprising at least one protruding element to generate a vortex of the airflow

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2606289Y2 (en) * 1993-06-07 2000-10-10 富士重工業株式会社 Aircraft nacelle equipment
JPH08133188A (en) * 1994-11-07 1996-05-28 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Resistance reducing device for wing
JPH0911993A (en) * 1995-07-04 1997-01-14 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Helicopter
JP3714722B2 (en) * 1996-05-09 2005-11-09 本田技研工業株式会社 Peeling suppression device
GB2402196B (en) * 2003-05-29 2006-05-17 Rolls Royce Plc A laminar flow nacelle for an aircraft engine

Patent Citations (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3744745A (en) * 1971-09-30 1973-07-10 Mc Donnell Douglas Corp Liftvanes
US4019696A (en) * 1973-12-28 1977-04-26 The Boeing Company Method of and apparatus for enhancing Coanda flow attachment over a wing and flap surface
US3920203A (en) * 1974-12-23 1975-11-18 Boeing Co Thrust control apparatus for obtaining maximum thrust reversal in minimum time upon landing of an aircraft
US3968946A (en) * 1975-03-31 1976-07-13 The Boeing Company Extendable aerodynamic fairing
US4314681A (en) * 1979-08-31 1982-02-09 General Electric Company Drag-reducing component
US4466587A (en) * 1981-12-21 1984-08-21 General Electric Company Nacelle installation
US4643376A (en) * 1982-09-30 1987-02-17 The Boeing Company Shock inducing pod for causing flow separation
US4685643A (en) * 1983-08-04 1987-08-11 The Boeing Company Nacelle/wing assembly with vortex control device
US4540143A (en) * 1983-08-04 1985-09-10 The Boeing Company Nacelle/wing assembly with wake control device
US4884772A (en) * 1986-07-28 1989-12-05 The Boeing Company Cantilevered vortex control device
US5443230A (en) * 1993-12-21 1995-08-22 United Technologies Corporation Aircraft wing/nacelle combination
US6116015A (en) * 1998-03-06 2000-09-12 Rolls-Royce Plc Breather outlet
US20050011993A1 (en) * 2003-07-18 2005-01-20 Konings Christopher A. Nacelle chine installation for drag reduction
US6964397B2 (en) * 2003-07-18 2005-11-15 The Boeing Company Nacelle chine installation for drag reduction
US20050274846A1 (en) * 2004-06-15 2005-12-15 Roy Dun Methods and apparatuses for controlling airflow proximate to engine/airfoil systems
US20080006738A1 (en) * 2005-10-28 2008-01-10 The Boeing Company Aircraft engine structure-mounted aim-point biasing infrared countermeasure apparatus and method
US20090230251A1 (en) * 2008-03-14 2009-09-17 Airbus France Airplane engine pylon comprising at least one protruding element to generate a vortex of the airflow

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090078830A1 (en) * 2005-11-08 2009-03-26 Airbus France Aircraft comprising a central fairing that adjusts the pressure on the wing structures by means of local geometric deformations
US8177170B2 (en) * 2005-11-08 2012-05-15 Airbus Operations Sas Aircraft comprising a central fairing that adjusts the pressure on the wing structures by means of local geometric deformations
EP2402251A3 (en) * 2010-07-01 2015-08-05 Rolls-Royce plc A jet engine installation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
RU2437800C2 (en) 2011-12-27
FR2901538B1 (en) 2008-07-18
RU2008150852A (en) 2010-06-27
WO2007135270A1 (en) 2007-11-29
US8167248B2 (en) 2012-05-01
CA2650194A1 (en) 2007-11-29
JP5313884B2 (en) 2013-10-09
JP2009537399A (en) 2009-10-29
CA2650194C (en) 2014-11-25
EP2019776B1 (en) 2010-10-27
BRPI0710386A2 (en) 2011-08-09
ATE486009T1 (en) 2010-11-15
DE602007010125D1 (en) 2010-12-09
CN101448701A (en) 2009-06-03
EP2019776A1 (en) 2009-02-04
FR2901538A1 (en) 2007-11-30
CN101448701B (en) 2012-06-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10589846B2 (en) Split blended winglet
US7784732B2 (en) Boundary-layer-ingesting inlet flow control system
US20080223991A1 (en) Wing Tip Device
US8226038B2 (en) Microvanes for aircraft aft body drag reduction
CN102282070A (en) Horizontal stabilising surface of an aircraft
US8302912B2 (en) Shock bump
CN108639339A (en) A kind of UAV aerodynamic layout
US8167248B2 (en) Aircraft comprising a device for reducing the induced drag
CN109367795A (en) Fuselage bilateral air inlet high-speed aircraft aerodynamic arrangement
EP0735970B1 (en) Aircraft wing/nacelle combination
EP2604516A2 (en) Minimally intrusive wingtip vortex wake mitigation using microvane arrays
JP3980775B2 (en) Aircraft wave resistance reduction method
US6126118A (en) Flow separator reducer
Wortman Reduction of fuselage form drag by vortex flows
CN208647149U (en) A kind of UAV aerodynamic layout
EP2029427B1 (en) Method of and apparatus for producing aerodynamic resistance on an aircraft
US8172185B2 (en) Establishment of laminar boundary layer flow on an aerofoil body
US20160114897A1 (en) Airplane Suspension Cowling Structure With Wing-Mounted Arrangement
US3275265A (en) Boundary layer control flaps and apparatus thereof
US20240109648A1 (en) Aircraft portion with a reduced drag
RU2063364C1 (en) Aeroplane structure

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: AIRBUS FRANCE,FRANCE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FOL, THIERRY;DEFOS, MARJORIE;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080925 TO 20081013;REEL/FRAME:021809/0666

Owner name: AIRBUS FRANCE, FRANCE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FOL, THIERRY;DEFOS, MARJORIE;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080925 TO 20081013;REEL/FRAME:021809/0666

AS Assignment

Owner name: AIRBUS OPERATIONS SAS, FRANCE

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:AIRBUS FRANCE;REEL/FRAME:026298/0269

Effective date: 20090630

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 12