EP1086889A2 - Stabilizer fin - Google Patents
Stabilizer fin Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1086889A2 EP1086889A2 EP00120138A EP00120138A EP1086889A2 EP 1086889 A2 EP1086889 A2 EP 1086889A2 EP 00120138 A EP00120138 A EP 00120138A EP 00120138 A EP00120138 A EP 00120138A EP 1086889 A2 EP1086889 A2 EP 1086889A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- fin
- plane
- wedges
- vertex
- transverse central
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B1/00—Hydrodynamic or hydrostatic features of hulls or of hydrofoils
- B63B1/16—Hydrodynamic or hydrostatic features of hulls or of hydrofoils deriving additional lift from hydrodynamic forces
- B63B1/24—Hydrodynamic or hydrostatic features of hulls or of hydrofoils deriving additional lift from hydrodynamic forces of hydrofoil type
- B63B1/248—Shape, hydrodynamic features, construction of the foil
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63H—MARINE PROPULSION OR STEERING
- B63H25/00—Steering; Slowing-down otherwise than by use of propulsive elements; Dynamic anchoring, i.e. positioning vessels by means of main or auxiliary propulsive elements
- B63H25/06—Steering by rudders
- B63H25/38—Rudders
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a stabilizer fin, particularly for water-borne crafts.
- EP-0,571,401 discloses a hydrodynamic stabilizer fin, to be used in a submerged condition, which is constituted by a single element having an elongated body at the rear (pointed) end of which there is an element having a substantially wedge-shaped transverse cross-section and in which the vertex is blended with said rear end and the end is flat.
- a drawback of the conventional stabilizer fin is that it can be subject to vibration and also produces noise.
- vorticity-promoting devices which are constituted by elements protruding from the wing and that can be likened to rectangular mini-ailerons which have alternating inclinations with respect to the surface of the wing and are supported by small cylinders.
- the aim of the present invention is to solve the above noted problems, eliminating the drawbacks of the cited prior art, by providing a stabilizer fin, particularly for water-borne crafts, which allows to increase lift and reduce vibrations and noise.
- an object of the present invention is to provide a fin which is structurally simple and easy to manufacture.
- Another object is to provide a fin which also allows to achieve an improvement in terms of maximum obtainable lift.
- Another important object is to provide a stabilizer fin which has low manufacturing costs and can be manufactured with conventional machines and equipment.
- Another object is to provide a solution which can also be applied in conventional fins by virtue of interventions which have very low costs, so as to allow to increase their roll stabilization effectiveness.
- a stabilizer fin particularly for water-borne crafts, which comprises a tapering body with a symmetrical profile, characterized in that one or more wedge- or ramp-shaped elements are provided on the lateral surface or surfaces of the body and protrude therefrom.
- 1 designates a stabilizer fin which is particularly used in water-borne crafts mainly in order to increase their lift.
- the fin comprises a body, designated by the reference numeral 2, which has a tapering shape with a symmetrical cross-section, for example of type known in the literature by the name NACA.
- the body 2 has a first rounded end 3 which protrudes so as to form a pair of first lateral surfaces 4a and 4b which are blended one another at a second pointed end 5.
- the body 2 is transversely provided with two second flat lateral surfaces 6a and 6b, and a shaft 7 for connection, for example, to the keel of a water-borne craft is associated with at least one of such surfaces.
- the stabilizer fin is characterized in that it has, at one or both of the first lateral surfaces 4a and 4b, one or more wedge- or ramp-shaped elements, designated by the reference numeral 8.
- the wedges or ramps 8 have an essentially triangular plan shape, in which the base 9 lies approximately at a transverse central plane 10 of the body 2 and the vertex 11 is directed toward the second pointed end 5.
- Each wedge or ramp 8 further has, in a sectional view taken along a plane 12 that passes through an altitude line that connects each base 9 to the vertex 11 and is perpendicular to a transverse central plane of the body 2, a triangular configuration in which one cathetus 13 lies at a plane which is tangent to the intersection of the planes 12 and 10.
- the cathetus 13 is part of the upper surface 14 of each wedge or ramp, while the vertex 11 thereof is spaced by a given extent from the adjacent first lateral surface of the body 2.
- Figures 4 to 9 are charts related to measurements taken on a specimen executed according to the teachings of the present invention and conducted in a cavitation tunnel.
- ⁇ designates the cavitation index
- C L designates the lift coefficient
- ⁇ designates the angle of attack.
- Figures 4 and 5 are charts in which the X-axis plots the angle of attack and the Y-axis plots the lift coefficient with a cavitation index of 2 and 3 and considering a test section velocity, designated by V C , equal to approximately 7 m/s, which corresponds to a Reynolds number (Rn) of 1.7x10 6 .
- a circle (o) designates the values that can be obtained from a fin without the wedges or ramps and a triangle ( ⁇ ) designates the values that can be found with the solution according to the present invention.
- laminar cavitation at the leading edge causes separation of the boundary layer ahead of the wedge, gradually canceling out its beneficial effects.
- Figures 6 and 7 plot the drag coefficient, designated as C D , considering a cavitation index ⁇ of 3 and 2 respectively.
- the boundary layer between two adjacent wedges or ramps becomes thinner and part of the boundary layer that had formed upstream along the cord is expelled in the external flow of the wedge or ramp.
- Figures 8 and 9 plot these ratios and therefore plot the trends of the efficiency of the fin as the angle of attack varies.
- the illustrated solution can be easily manufactured and obtained even on conventional fins, since the modification can be achieved rapidly and easily.
- the materials and the shapes that constitute the wedges or ramps, as well as their number, arrangement and spacing, can be the most pertinent according to specific requirements.
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a stabilizer fin, particularly for water-borne crafts.
- EP-0,571,401 discloses a hydrodynamic stabilizer fin, to be used in a submerged condition, which is constituted by a single element having an elongated body at the rear (pointed) end of which there is an element having a substantially wedge-shaped transverse cross-section and in which the vertex is blended with said rear end and the end is flat.
- The function of such conventional fins is substantially to increase lift.
- A drawback of the conventional stabilizer fin is that it can be subject to vibration and also produces noise.
- It is also known to use vorticity-promoting devices which are constituted by elements protruding from the wing and that can be likened to rectangular mini-ailerons which have alternating inclinations with respect to the surface of the wing and are supported by small cylinders.
- Other conventional solutions for achieving lift increases consist, for example, in using movable flaps, which however suffer the drawback that they increase the complexity of the kinematic mechanism of the fin besides having high manufacturing costs.
- However, these solutions still suffer drawbacks, including the fact that they are not ideal as regards solving the problem of stalling.
- The aim of the present invention is to solve the above noted problems, eliminating the drawbacks of the cited prior art, by providing a stabilizer fin, particularly for water-borne crafts, which allows to increase lift and reduce vibrations and noise.
- Within the above aim, an object of the present invention is to provide a fin which is structurally simple and easy to manufacture.
- Another object is to provide a fin which also allows to achieve an improvement in terms of maximum obtainable lift.
- Another important object is to provide a stabilizer fin which has low manufacturing costs and can be manufactured with conventional machines and equipment.
- Another object is to provide a solution which can also be applied in conventional fins by virtue of interventions which have very low costs, so as to allow to increase their roll stabilization effectiveness.
- These and other objects, which will become better apparent hereinafter, are achieved by a stabilizer fin, particularly for water-borne crafts, which comprises a tapering body with a symmetrical profile, characterized in that one or more wedge- or ramp-shaped elements are provided on the lateral surface or surfaces of the body and protrude therefrom.
- Further characteristics and advantages of the invention will become better apparent from the following detailed description of a particular but not exclusive embodiment, illustrated only by way of non-limitative example in the accompanying drawings, wherein:
- Figure 1 is a top view of the stabilizer fin;
- Figure 2 is a first side view of the fin;
- Figure 3 is a second side view of the fin.
-
- With reference to the above cited figures, 1 designates a stabilizer fin which is particularly used in water-borne crafts mainly in order to increase their lift.
- The fin comprises a body, designated by the
reference numeral 2, which has a tapering shape with a symmetrical cross-section, for example of type known in the literature by the name NACA. - The
body 2 has a firstrounded end 3 which protrudes so as to form a pair of firstlateral surfaces 4a and 4b which are blended one another at a secondpointed end 5. - The
body 2 is transversely provided with two second flatlateral surfaces 6a and 6b, and ashaft 7 for connection, for example, to the keel of a water-borne craft is associated with at least one of such surfaces. - The stabilizer fin is characterized in that it has, at one or both of the first
lateral surfaces 4a and 4b, one or more wedge- or ramp-shaped elements, designated by thereference numeral 8. - In the illustrated embodiment, the wedges or
ramps 8 have an essentially triangular plan shape, in which thebase 9 lies approximately at a transversecentral plane 10 of thebody 2 and thevertex 11 is directed toward the secondpointed end 5. - Each wedge or
ramp 8 further has, in a sectional view taken along aplane 12 that passes through an altitude line that connects eachbase 9 to thevertex 11 and is perpendicular to a transverse central plane of thebody 2, a triangular configuration in which onecathetus 13 lies at a plane which is tangent to the intersection of theplanes - In practice, therefore, the
cathetus 13 is part of theupper surface 14 of each wedge or ramp, while thevertex 11 thereof is spaced by a given extent from the adjacent first lateral surface of thebody 2. - Figures 4 to 9 are charts related to measurements taken on a specimen executed according to the teachings of the present invention and conducted in a cavitation tunnel.
- The symbol σ designates the cavitation index, CL designates the lift coefficient, and α designates the angle of attack.
- Figures 4 and 5 are charts in which the X-axis plots the angle of attack and the Y-axis plots the lift coefficient with a cavitation index of 2 and 3 and considering a test section velocity, designated by VC, equal to approximately 7 m/s, which corresponds to a Reynolds number (Rn) of 1.7x106.
- A circle (o) designates the values that can be obtained from a fin without the wedges or ramps and a triangle (▵) designates the values that can be found with the solution according to the present invention.
- In Figure 5, the chart differs by considering a cavitation index of 3.
- It is thus evident that the lift coefficient equal to 3 is higher in the solution according to the present invention.
- It is also evident that, in the absence of cavitation, the described solution is able to act positively on the boundary layer by delaying its separation, i.e., by extending the curve CL - α beyond the angle whereat the lift of the fin without the wedges or ramps decreases.
- As one approaches lower cavitation indexes, laminar cavitation at the leading edge (typical for sections working at high angles of attack) causes separation of the boundary layer ahead of the wedge, gradually canceling out its beneficial effects.
- The maximum lift increase that can be obtained with the described solution, in the absence of cavitation, is higher than 10%; it has also been noted that the angle of variation from linear behavior is increased by more than three degrees in the absence of cavitation (in which the cavitation index σ = atm.).
- The curves also show that the lift increase can be utilized for high cavitation indexes and angles of attack of the fin; these conditions correspond to low speeds of forward travel of the water-borne craft, which indeed are usually the most critical ones for stabilization systems, thus achieving a great technical advantage.
- Figures 6 and 7 plot the drag coefficient, designated as CD, considering a cavitation index σ of 3 and 2 respectively.
- It is thus noted that, again in the absence of cavitation, a decrease in drag is appreciable, confirming the correct operation of the described solution.
- The boundary layer between two adjacent wedges or ramps becomes thinner and part of the boundary layer that had formed upstream along the cord is expelled in the external flow of the wedge or ramp.
- All this acts so as to reduce the tangential tensions which generate the friction drag of the section.
- Further, for high angles of attack, the fact of delaying separation allows to decrease the form drag of the section.
- It has thus been observed that the invention has achieved the intended aim and objects, and that a stabilizer fin has therefore been obtained in which, in addition to increasing the lift of the profile, drag has also been reduced, furthermore considerably increasing the efficiency of the wing, defined by the ratio CL/CD.
- Figures 8 and 9 plot these ratios and therefore plot the trends of the efficiency of the fin as the angle of attack varies.
- In general, one observes .an increase in efficiency, especially at the lower angles of attack; this introduces another technical advantage, since for an equal lift the illustrated solution offers less drag contrasting the motion of the water-borne craft.
- Moreover, the measurements made show that the described solution does not have particular degradations as regards cavitation and indeed it has been found that in some conditions it is able to reduce bubble cavitation on the blade of the stabilizer.
- Finally, the illustrated solution can be easily manufactured and obtained even on conventional fins, since the modification can be achieved rapidly and easily.
- The invention is of course susceptible of numerous modifications and variations, all of which are within the scope of the same inventive concept.
- Likewise, the materials and the shapes that constitute the wedges or ramps, as well as their number, arrangement and spacing, can be the most pertinent according to specific requirements.
- The disclosures in Italian Patent Application No. TV99A000102 from which this application claims priority are incorporated herein by reference.
- Where technical features mentioned in any claim are followed by reference signs, those reference signs have been included for the sole purpose of increasing the intelligibility of the claims and accordingly, such reference signs do not have any limiting effect on the interpretation of each element identified by way of example by such reference signs.
Claims (5)
- A stabilizer fin, particularly for water-borne crafts, comprising a tapering body with a symmetrical profile, characterized in that one or more wedge- or ramp-shaped elements are provided on the lateral surface or surfaces of said body and protrude therefrom.
- The fin according to claim 1, characterized in that said body has a first rounded end which forms two first lateral surfaces which are blended one another at a second pointed end and is transversely provided with a pair of second lateral flat surfaces, said wedge- or ramp-shaped elements being provided at one or both of said first lateral surfaces.
- The fin according to claim 2, characterized in that said wedges substantially have a triangular plan shape, in which the base lies approximately at a transverse central plane of said body and the vertex is directed toward said second pointed end.
- The fin according to claim 3, characterized in that each one of said wedges or ramps has, in a cross-section taken along the plane that passes through the altitude that connects each one of said bases to the vertex and is perpendicular to the transverse central plane of said body, a triangular shape in which one cathetus lies at a plane which is tangent to the intersection between said transverse central plane of said body and said plane that passes through the altitude that connects each one of said bases to said vertices and is perpendicular to said transverse central plane of said body.
- The fin according to claim 4, characterized in that said cathetus is part of an upper surface of each one of said wedges, while said vertex is spaced by a chosen extent from the adjacent first lateral surface of said body.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
IT1999TV000102A IT1311861B1 (en) | 1999-09-22 | 1999-09-22 | STABILIZER FIN STRUCTURE |
ITTV990102 | 1999-09-22 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1086889A2 true EP1086889A2 (en) | 2001-03-28 |
EP1086889A3 EP1086889A3 (en) | 2002-05-29 |
Family
ID=11420680
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP00120138A Withdrawn EP1086889A3 (en) | 1999-09-22 | 2000-09-20 | Stabilizer fin |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1086889A3 (en) |
IT (1) | IT1311861B1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102975839A (en) * | 2012-12-20 | 2013-03-20 | 刘文斌 | Wave energy propulsion device and water transportation tool equipped with device |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111332420B (en) * | 2018-12-18 | 2022-04-15 | 英辉南方造船(广州番禺)有限公司 | Course stabilizing fin of high-speed monohull ship and installation method thereof |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0571401A1 (en) | 1991-01-04 | 1993-12-01 | Vickers Plc | Hydrodynamic fin for water-borne craft. |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2099229A (en) * | 1936-01-15 | 1937-11-16 | Possenheim Louis | Fin equipped rudder |
US2800291A (en) * | 1950-10-24 | 1957-07-23 | Stephens Arthur Veryan | Solid boundary surface for contact with a relatively moving fluid medium |
US5386955A (en) * | 1986-05-22 | 1995-02-07 | Rolls-Royce Plc | Control of fluid flow |
US4930729A (en) * | 1986-05-22 | 1990-06-05 | Rolls-Royce Plc | Control of fluid flow |
US4825795A (en) * | 1987-03-19 | 1989-05-02 | Slemmons Arthur J | Sailing craft keel and rudder flow modifiers |
IL115768A0 (en) * | 1995-10-25 | 1996-01-19 | Steinberg Gal | Propeller foil |
-
1999
- 1999-09-22 IT IT1999TV000102A patent/IT1311861B1/en active
-
2000
- 2000-09-20 EP EP00120138A patent/EP1086889A3/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0571401A1 (en) | 1991-01-04 | 1993-12-01 | Vickers Plc | Hydrodynamic fin for water-borne craft. |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102975839A (en) * | 2012-12-20 | 2013-03-20 | 刘文斌 | Wave energy propulsion device and water transportation tool equipped with device |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1086889A3 (en) | 2002-05-29 |
ITTV990102A1 (en) | 2001-03-22 |
IT1311861B1 (en) | 2002-03-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6345791B1 (en) | Streamwise variable height riblets for reducing skin friction drag of surfaces | |
CN101535124B (en) | Wing tip structure, in particular of aircraft | |
US6431498B1 (en) | Scalloped wing leading edge | |
US20150217851A1 (en) | Wing configuration | |
US20010030264A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for reducing trailing vortices in the wake of an aircraft | |
WO1987001345A1 (en) | Foil | |
JP2010530333A (en) | Small wings | |
RU2499732C2 (en) | Aerodynamic structure with irregular ledges to deflect shock wave | |
JP6563645B2 (en) | Airflow blocking device | |
KR970010829B1 (en) | Ship rudder | |
US9586464B2 (en) | Vehicle sunroof wind deflector | |
CA2713362A1 (en) | Shock bump | |
US6606959B1 (en) | High speed drag reducing ventilation for marine vessel hulls | |
EP1086889A2 (en) | Stabilizer fin | |
US5398371A (en) | Multiple lip wiper blade | |
EP2247497B1 (en) | Aerodynamic structure with asymmetrical shock bump | |
JPH0310913A (en) | Pneumatic tire | |
US4660788A (en) | Supercritical wing | |
US4409922A (en) | V-Shaped bottom for speedy motorboats having improved planing supporting skids | |
CA2045367A1 (en) | Vertebra for a windscreen wiper blade | |
CN217227900U (en) | Screw and aircraft | |
Lagerstrom et al. | Linearized Theory of Supersonic Control Surfaces | |
JPS59220489A (en) | Ship-bottom structure | |
GB1599633A (en) | Aerofoils | |
CA2350161A1 (en) | Airfoil suitable for forward and reverse flow |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Free format text: 7B 63B 1/24 A, 7B 63B 39/06 B |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20021031 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20030514 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN |
|
18W | Application withdrawn |
Effective date: 20030918 |