CA2144350A1 - Drag reducing arrangement for athlete - Google Patents
Drag reducing arrangement for athleteInfo
- Publication number
- CA2144350A1 CA2144350A1 CA002144350A CA2144350A CA2144350A1 CA 2144350 A1 CA2144350 A1 CA 2144350A1 CA 002144350 A CA002144350 A CA 002144350A CA 2144350 A CA2144350 A CA 2144350A CA 2144350 A1 CA2144350 A1 CA 2144350A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- athlete
- boundary layer
- vortex
- garment
- delaying
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A41—WEARING APPAREL
- A41D—OUTERWEAR; PROTECTIVE GARMENTS; ACCESSORIES
- A41D13/00—Professional, industrial or sporting protective garments, e.g. surgeons' gowns or garments protecting against blows or punches
- A41D13/0015—Sports garments other than provided for in groups A41D13/0007 - A41D13/088
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A41—WEARING APPAREL
- A41D—OUTERWEAR; PROTECTIVE GARMENTS; ACCESSORIES
- A41D31/00—Materials specially adapted for outerwear
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A41—WEARING APPAREL
- A41D—OUTERWEAR; PROTECTIVE GARMENTS; ACCESSORIES
- A41D7/00—Bathing gowns; Swim-suits, drawers, or trunks; Beach suits
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A41—WEARING APPAREL
- A41D—OUTERWEAR; PROTECTIVE GARMENTS; ACCESSORIES
- A41D2400/00—Functions or special features of garments
- A41D2400/24—Reducing drag or turbulence in air or water
Abstract
According to the present invention there is provided a drag reducing arrangement for the body of an athlete body moving through a fluid medium, comprising a device attachable to the athlete's body for delaying the onset of boundary layer separation at a trailing surface thereof.
Description
~ ~4~5~
This invention relates to a drag reducing device for the body of an athlete body moving through a fluid medium.
Many athletic sports inherently involve an athlete moving his body through a f luid medium, such as air or 5 water. Typically, such sports are swimming, cycling, skiing, and speed skating.
The drag on these athletes can be broken down into three main sub types:
Wave drag results when a body moves on the surface of a 10 fluid producing a wake (only the swimmer when on the surface of the water f~nrr7lnt~rS this type of drag).
Skin friction drag results from the viscosity of the fluid and is applicable to all of the sports listed above.
Fluid in contact with the surface of a body in motion 15 decelerates to zero velocity with respect to the body. The difference in velocity this creates between the free stream flow and the skin of the body results in a finite shear region called a `boundary layer'. This boundary layer grows in thickness as it progresses from the front of the body to 20 the back. In a~Ldition, the boundary layer may progress through two different states depending on flow conditions.
In the laminar state the flow is smooth and the skin friction drag is low. In the turbulent state, a laminar boundary layer may `transition' to a tllrhl~ nt one under the 25 right conditions. This results in high skin friction.
Form or Eddy-Making drag occurs if boundary layer flow encounters an ` adverse pressure gradient ', i . e ., a region where the flow decelerates. The Elow may separate from the body resulting in the formation of `Eddies' which result in 30 a low pressure region aft of the body. This can result in a dramatic increase in drag over a flow which remains `attached'. Unfortunately, laminar boundary layers, which have the lowest drag are also the most susceptible to separation. Conseriuently, effective drag reduction technlque D~ n~=~T~\9 ~ 75 .DDC
2144~
requires an optimal CL...,~LI s~e between ~orm and skin f riction drag .
Which of the previously mentioned types of drag is the most prPfinm; n~nt dictat~s what methods of drag reduction 5 will be effective. Streamlined shapes experience drag which is almost e~tirely the result of skin f riction . These shapes are designed, either by nature or engineers, not to induce flow separation. Xowever, humans are designed for low speed land based locomotion. Consequently, they are not 10 ` str~ml; n~ even in the lowest drag body positions .
With respect to the sports listed above, drag reduction efforts to date have largely ~n~ntrated o~ rf~ ;n~ 8kin friction drag. Some methods currently in use are:
a. delaying the development of a turbulent boundary 15 layer ( such methods include smoothing the body surf ace and streamwise riblets - a typical example of such a method is described in US Patent no . 5 , 033 , 116 - ); and b. covering the surface with a lubricant which is ` shed' in the flow thereby reducing the net shear stress at 20 the body surface.
However, since humans are not str~ml; n~d, surprisingly reducing the skin friction drag may actually increase the overall drag because delaying transition to a turbulent boundary layer may induce earlier separation when the flow 25 Pn~ollntl~rs an adverse pressure gradient, such as occurs in the vicinity of a curved surface. This effect may dramatically increase form drag, more than offsetting any gains f rom reduced skin f riction .
A maj or source of drag in many racing sports results 30 from flow separation at curved surfaces on the athlete' 8 body, buch as at the athlete' s posterior, arms or back of the head. Spe~ifi-~lly the sports which are most affected by this type of drag include any sport in which the athlete' s torso is aligned with the direction of motion.
-- 2 -- -- =
~:~9~ 011D~.DO'IIZ9TIC~91775.190C
This invention relates to a drag reducing device for the body of an athlete body moving through a fluid medium.
Many athletic sports inherently involve an athlete moving his body through a f luid medium, such as air or 5 water. Typically, such sports are swimming, cycling, skiing, and speed skating.
The drag on these athletes can be broken down into three main sub types:
Wave drag results when a body moves on the surface of a 10 fluid producing a wake (only the swimmer when on the surface of the water f~nrr7lnt~rS this type of drag).
Skin friction drag results from the viscosity of the fluid and is applicable to all of the sports listed above.
Fluid in contact with the surface of a body in motion 15 decelerates to zero velocity with respect to the body. The difference in velocity this creates between the free stream flow and the skin of the body results in a finite shear region called a `boundary layer'. This boundary layer grows in thickness as it progresses from the front of the body to 20 the back. In a~Ldition, the boundary layer may progress through two different states depending on flow conditions.
In the laminar state the flow is smooth and the skin friction drag is low. In the turbulent state, a laminar boundary layer may `transition' to a tllrhl~ nt one under the 25 right conditions. This results in high skin friction.
Form or Eddy-Making drag occurs if boundary layer flow encounters an ` adverse pressure gradient ', i . e ., a region where the flow decelerates. The Elow may separate from the body resulting in the formation of `Eddies' which result in 30 a low pressure region aft of the body. This can result in a dramatic increase in drag over a flow which remains `attached'. Unfortunately, laminar boundary layers, which have the lowest drag are also the most susceptible to separation. Conseriuently, effective drag reduction technlque D~ n~=~T~\9 ~ 75 .DDC
2144~
requires an optimal CL...,~LI s~e between ~orm and skin f riction drag .
Which of the previously mentioned types of drag is the most prPfinm; n~nt dictat~s what methods of drag reduction 5 will be effective. Streamlined shapes experience drag which is almost e~tirely the result of skin f riction . These shapes are designed, either by nature or engineers, not to induce flow separation. Xowever, humans are designed for low speed land based locomotion. Consequently, they are not 10 ` str~ml; n~ even in the lowest drag body positions .
With respect to the sports listed above, drag reduction efforts to date have largely ~n~ntrated o~ rf~ ;n~ 8kin friction drag. Some methods currently in use are:
a. delaying the development of a turbulent boundary 15 layer ( such methods include smoothing the body surf ace and streamwise riblets - a typical example of such a method is described in US Patent no . 5 , 033 , 116 - ); and b. covering the surface with a lubricant which is ` shed' in the flow thereby reducing the net shear stress at 20 the body surface.
However, since humans are not str~ml; n~d, surprisingly reducing the skin friction drag may actually increase the overall drag because delaying transition to a turbulent boundary layer may induce earlier separation when the flow 25 Pn~ollntl~rs an adverse pressure gradient, such as occurs in the vicinity of a curved surface. This effect may dramatically increase form drag, more than offsetting any gains f rom reduced skin f riction .
A maj or source of drag in many racing sports results 30 from flow separation at curved surfaces on the athlete' 8 body, buch as at the athlete' s posterior, arms or back of the head. Spe~ifi-~lly the sports which are most affected by this type of drag include any sport in which the athlete' s torso is aligned with the direction of motion.
-- 2 -- -- =
~:~9~ 011D~.DO'IIZ9TIC~91775.190C
2~3~
An object of the invention is to reduce the drag on an athlete whose body moves through a f luid meaium .
According to the present invention there is provided a drag reducing arrangemnt f or the body of an athlete body 5 moving through a fluid medium, comprising means attachable to the athlete' 8 body for delaying the onset of boundary layer separation at a trailing surface thereof.
The delaying means should be located ju8t upstream of =:
the points of anticipated flow separation on the trailing 10 surface, i.e. upstream of a portion of the body that curves away from the relative fluid flow, such as just upstream of the athlete' 8 posterior, back of his head, or on ~he sides of his arms or legs.
By "delaying the on8et of boundary layer separation~' is 15 meant the ~act that flow separation occurs further downstream of the relative fluid flow than would be the case without such means. The word "delaying" is employed more in a spatial sense than temporal.
In a preferred eD~bodiment, the means attachable to the 20 athlete' 8 body comprises one or more vortex generators, preferably a line or vortex generator8. Various shapes, such as V' 8, wedges, -and cyl-inders, can be employed for this purpose .
Other mean8 o- delaying boundary layer separation can 25 oe employed. For example, sur~ace rou~hPnin~ can be used.
Alternatively, a trip wire or bead can be located in place of the vortex generators.
The drag reduction method propo8ed in accordance with the invention thus focuses on delaying boundary layer 30 separation. Classically, form drag is reduced by altering the shape of the object in the flow to more closely approximate a strea~nline shape. This is often not practical in the case of a human being. When practical, such methods are generally outlawed by the applicable sports governing ~\91275.DOC
2~ 4435Q
body. For example, fairinys are-generally illegal in almogt all 8anctioned cycling races. Consequently, any method which reduces drag must also be subtle in order to avoid pr--h; h1 ~ n The invention depends on the fact that, in an adverse pressure ~ri:l~qi Pnt, the velocity profile of the boundary layer eventually becomes inflected. Essentially, a near wall sub-layer of low speed flow beging to grow in th; ~kn~flg which causes the boundary layer to lose adherence. This condition will result in separation if the adverse pressure region cnnt1 n~ too long or the pres~ure gradient increases . By introducing high ener~y ( i . e . high speed) fluid into the near-wall portion of the boundary layer, the onset of boundary layer separation can be delayed. Five methods of achieving this result include:
a . Boundary Layer Tripping . A laminar boundary layer can be `tripped' to a turbulent one by ro~l~h,on;n~ the object' 8 surface or by placing an obstacle in the flow.
~owever, if the flow is already turbulent this strategy will be ineffective and will, in fact, hasten any separation of the boundary layer. The boundary layer must there~ore be tripped in a laminar flow region.
b. Boundary Layer Suction. This process involves a series of pores on the surface of the object which literally remove the near wall low energy flow.
c . Boundary Layer In j ection Through an array of small jets, high speed ~luid is injected parallel to the sur~ace in the near-wall flow.
d. Large ~ddy Breakup devices. Devices, such as `wings~, are mounted an even distance above the surface within the flow in a region where separation is expected. In essence, these devices damp out the mounting turbulence which inhibits separation.
D~ .. \91~75~DOC
2191~3~Q
e. Vortex Generators. These passive devices create vorticeæ whose axis of rotation is oriented parallel to the flow. This ha3 the effect of transporting high speed flow from the free stream into the near wall region. Since the 5 vortices persist far downstream of the generators themselves, the method is very effective at preventing separation. Furthermore since these devices also trip a laminar boundary layer into a turbulent one, they are effective in a wide variety of flow conditions.
While the other techniques could be employed, vortex generators show the most promise or significantly reducing the overall drag in the afuL, t;oned sports. The vortex generators the~selves are conveniently solid pieces attached at key flow points on the athlete' s garment . Specifically 15 the devices are attached at points upstream of anticipated flow separation. The most significant region of flow separation are the head and posterior of the athlete.
The invention also provides a method of ro~ ; n~ drag f or the body of an athlete body moving through a f luid 20 medium, comprising delaying the onset of boundary layer separation at a trailing surface thereof.
The inventi~n further provides an athlete ' 8 garmant having attached thereto means for delaying the onset of boundary layer separation at a trailing sur~ace of the 25 athlete' 8 body .
The invention also provides an athlete' 8 body suit having provided thereon means for delaying the onset of boundary layer separation at trailing surfaces thereof during an athletic activity, said means comprising vortex 30 generators located a points just upstream of said trailing curved surfaces.
The invention still further provides an athletic helmet comprising means ~rt~n~ling thereacross on the top surface thereof to delay the onset of boundary layer separation.
D:\Y \ .\9~75.DDC
~ ~43~
The invention will now be described in mare detail, by way of example only! with reference to the accompanying drawi~gs, in which:-Figure 1 illustrates koundary layer separation;
Figure 2 illustrates form drag;
Figure 3 shows the effect of vortex gerlerators inaccordance with the invention;
Figures 4a to 4f shows various types of vortex generator;
Figures 5 and 6 are rear and front views of a swimmer respectively;
Figures 7 and 8 are rear and front views of a cyclist respectively; and Figures 9 and 10 are rear and front views of a speed skater.
Referring to Figure 1, a solid object 1 is moving relative to a fluid medium 2. The fluid flow direction is shown by arrow 3. Of course, it is the relative motion that is important. It makes no difference whether it is the body or ~luid that is moving.
It is known from the laws of fluid mechanics that flow in the boundary layer 7 can be turbulent or laminar, i . e .
stn~ml in~A. As the object moves through the fluid, three region3 are created. In the forward region 4, the flow is essentially laminar close to the surface of the body 1. This is the region of lowest drag.
In the aft region 5, the flow is essentially tllrhlllpnt~
Here, there is a much higher skin friction.
A transition region 5 is present between the ~orward and a~t regions 4, 5, where the ~low close to the body changes from laminar to turbulent.
D~ 1~\91~75.DO~
2~35D
If the boundary layer encounters an adverse pressure gradient, i.e., a region where the flow decelerates, the flow may separate from the body, re3ulting in the formation of Eddies, which result in a pressure region aft of the 5 body. This results in a dramatic increase in drag relative to a flow that remains attached.
~ aminar boundary layers, which have the most skin friction drag, are the most susceptible to separation.
Turbulent boundary layers, while exhibiting higher skin 10 friction, are, however, less susceptible to flow separation.
Figure 2 shows a streamlined body 8 designed to delay the onset of separation in boundary layer 7 and thus reduce form drag. Flow separation occurs in transition region 6, resulting in the formation of trailing Eddies 9 aft of the 15 body 8. The str~ml ;ning of the shape helps to push the region 6 aft as much as possible.
With mechanical devices, form drag can be reduced in this way by careful design of the shape of the obj ect . In the case of the human body this is not possible. Thus in 20 order to reduce form drag, a device is attached to the boundary that is designed to delay the onset of boundary layer separation.
Figure 3 illustrates the principle. Vortex generators 11 are placed strategically on the surface 10 of an 25 athlete' 8 body just upstream of a re-entrant curve region 12, where flow separation of the boundary layer is expected to occur. The vortex generators ll serve to delay the onset of boundary flow separation by increasing the energy of the ~luid flow, thus significantly reducing form drag.
Figures 4a to 4f illustrate suitable vortex generators 11, which can be placed, preferably attached to the athlete' s garment, such as a body suit 12, in a row just upstream of a curved portion of the athlete' s body.
D~ 75.nOC
43~
Figure 4a showff a simple wing shape, which is placed at an angle to the fluid flow. Pigure 4b shows a wedge shape, and Figure 4c show3 a Vee shape. Fig 4d shows a cylinder, Fic7~ure 4e a truncated sphere or cap, and Fig, 4f, an airfoil 5 section. I~ach of these devices will produce a trailing vortex when placed in a fluid stream.
Figures 5 and 6 show respectively the rear and f ront sides of a swimmer. The vortex generators 11 are placed in a row on the athlete' s head and bottom, both front and rear, 10 just upstream of the re-entrant curvature. Small vortices are generated, which delay the onset of boundary layer separation. As a result, form drag is significantly reduced and the athlete' 8 performance ~nhiln~
The vortex generators 11 can be conveniently formed as 15 part of the athlete's body suit 12, which can also employ conventional 8kin-friction reducing tP~hn--l o~y.
While the vortex generator is the preferred method of reducing the onset of boundary layer separation, other technio~ues can be employed a3 described above.
The invention is applicable to other sports, such as cycling where the athlete's body moves through a fluid medium. In the case of cycling, as shown in Figures 7 and 8, the vortex generators are similarly attached to the athlete' 8 body just upstream of points where boundary layer separation would tend to occur, i.e. in a line on the head, over the posterior ~nd on the inner and outer sides of the arms and legs. In the case of the head, they can be conveniently attached to the back of the cyclists helmet, as ~hown in Figures 7 and 8.
Figures 9 and 10 show8 a similar arrangement for a speed skater.
The preferred vortex generators for the arms and legs are stub cylinders are caps as shown in Figures 4d and 4e.
D~ eTrr\~1775.DOC
214~3~
I'he important ~oint is that the vortex generators are placed upstream of the points o anticipated flow separation. By delaying the onset of flow separation at the trailin~ surfaces form dra~ is reduced.
An object of the invention is to reduce the drag on an athlete whose body moves through a f luid meaium .
According to the present invention there is provided a drag reducing arrangemnt f or the body of an athlete body 5 moving through a fluid medium, comprising means attachable to the athlete' 8 body for delaying the onset of boundary layer separation at a trailing surface thereof.
The delaying means should be located ju8t upstream of =:
the points of anticipated flow separation on the trailing 10 surface, i.e. upstream of a portion of the body that curves away from the relative fluid flow, such as just upstream of the athlete' 8 posterior, back of his head, or on ~he sides of his arms or legs.
By "delaying the on8et of boundary layer separation~' is 15 meant the ~act that flow separation occurs further downstream of the relative fluid flow than would be the case without such means. The word "delaying" is employed more in a spatial sense than temporal.
In a preferred eD~bodiment, the means attachable to the 20 athlete' 8 body comprises one or more vortex generators, preferably a line or vortex generator8. Various shapes, such as V' 8, wedges, -and cyl-inders, can be employed for this purpose .
Other mean8 o- delaying boundary layer separation can 25 oe employed. For example, sur~ace rou~hPnin~ can be used.
Alternatively, a trip wire or bead can be located in place of the vortex generators.
The drag reduction method propo8ed in accordance with the invention thus focuses on delaying boundary layer 30 separation. Classically, form drag is reduced by altering the shape of the object in the flow to more closely approximate a strea~nline shape. This is often not practical in the case of a human being. When practical, such methods are generally outlawed by the applicable sports governing ~\91275.DOC
2~ 4435Q
body. For example, fairinys are-generally illegal in almogt all 8anctioned cycling races. Consequently, any method which reduces drag must also be subtle in order to avoid pr--h; h1 ~ n The invention depends on the fact that, in an adverse pressure ~ri:l~qi Pnt, the velocity profile of the boundary layer eventually becomes inflected. Essentially, a near wall sub-layer of low speed flow beging to grow in th; ~kn~flg which causes the boundary layer to lose adherence. This condition will result in separation if the adverse pressure region cnnt1 n~ too long or the pres~ure gradient increases . By introducing high ener~y ( i . e . high speed) fluid into the near-wall portion of the boundary layer, the onset of boundary layer separation can be delayed. Five methods of achieving this result include:
a . Boundary Layer Tripping . A laminar boundary layer can be `tripped' to a turbulent one by ro~l~h,on;n~ the object' 8 surface or by placing an obstacle in the flow.
~owever, if the flow is already turbulent this strategy will be ineffective and will, in fact, hasten any separation of the boundary layer. The boundary layer must there~ore be tripped in a laminar flow region.
b. Boundary Layer Suction. This process involves a series of pores on the surface of the object which literally remove the near wall low energy flow.
c . Boundary Layer In j ection Through an array of small jets, high speed ~luid is injected parallel to the sur~ace in the near-wall flow.
d. Large ~ddy Breakup devices. Devices, such as `wings~, are mounted an even distance above the surface within the flow in a region where separation is expected. In essence, these devices damp out the mounting turbulence which inhibits separation.
D~ .. \91~75~DOC
2191~3~Q
e. Vortex Generators. These passive devices create vorticeæ whose axis of rotation is oriented parallel to the flow. This ha3 the effect of transporting high speed flow from the free stream into the near wall region. Since the 5 vortices persist far downstream of the generators themselves, the method is very effective at preventing separation. Furthermore since these devices also trip a laminar boundary layer into a turbulent one, they are effective in a wide variety of flow conditions.
While the other techniques could be employed, vortex generators show the most promise or significantly reducing the overall drag in the afuL, t;oned sports. The vortex generators the~selves are conveniently solid pieces attached at key flow points on the athlete' s garment . Specifically 15 the devices are attached at points upstream of anticipated flow separation. The most significant region of flow separation are the head and posterior of the athlete.
The invention also provides a method of ro~ ; n~ drag f or the body of an athlete body moving through a f luid 20 medium, comprising delaying the onset of boundary layer separation at a trailing surface thereof.
The inventi~n further provides an athlete ' 8 garmant having attached thereto means for delaying the onset of boundary layer separation at a trailing sur~ace of the 25 athlete' 8 body .
The invention also provides an athlete' 8 body suit having provided thereon means for delaying the onset of boundary layer separation at trailing surfaces thereof during an athletic activity, said means comprising vortex 30 generators located a points just upstream of said trailing curved surfaces.
The invention still further provides an athletic helmet comprising means ~rt~n~ling thereacross on the top surface thereof to delay the onset of boundary layer separation.
D:\Y \ .\9~75.DDC
~ ~43~
The invention will now be described in mare detail, by way of example only! with reference to the accompanying drawi~gs, in which:-Figure 1 illustrates koundary layer separation;
Figure 2 illustrates form drag;
Figure 3 shows the effect of vortex gerlerators inaccordance with the invention;
Figures 4a to 4f shows various types of vortex generator;
Figures 5 and 6 are rear and front views of a swimmer respectively;
Figures 7 and 8 are rear and front views of a cyclist respectively; and Figures 9 and 10 are rear and front views of a speed skater.
Referring to Figure 1, a solid object 1 is moving relative to a fluid medium 2. The fluid flow direction is shown by arrow 3. Of course, it is the relative motion that is important. It makes no difference whether it is the body or ~luid that is moving.
It is known from the laws of fluid mechanics that flow in the boundary layer 7 can be turbulent or laminar, i . e .
stn~ml in~A. As the object moves through the fluid, three region3 are created. In the forward region 4, the flow is essentially laminar close to the surface of the body 1. This is the region of lowest drag.
In the aft region 5, the flow is essentially tllrhlllpnt~
Here, there is a much higher skin friction.
A transition region 5 is present between the ~orward and a~t regions 4, 5, where the ~low close to the body changes from laminar to turbulent.
D~ 1~\91~75.DO~
2~35D
If the boundary layer encounters an adverse pressure gradient, i.e., a region where the flow decelerates, the flow may separate from the body, re3ulting in the formation of Eddies, which result in a pressure region aft of the 5 body. This results in a dramatic increase in drag relative to a flow that remains attached.
~ aminar boundary layers, which have the most skin friction drag, are the most susceptible to separation.
Turbulent boundary layers, while exhibiting higher skin 10 friction, are, however, less susceptible to flow separation.
Figure 2 shows a streamlined body 8 designed to delay the onset of separation in boundary layer 7 and thus reduce form drag. Flow separation occurs in transition region 6, resulting in the formation of trailing Eddies 9 aft of the 15 body 8. The str~ml ;ning of the shape helps to push the region 6 aft as much as possible.
With mechanical devices, form drag can be reduced in this way by careful design of the shape of the obj ect . In the case of the human body this is not possible. Thus in 20 order to reduce form drag, a device is attached to the boundary that is designed to delay the onset of boundary layer separation.
Figure 3 illustrates the principle. Vortex generators 11 are placed strategically on the surface 10 of an 25 athlete' 8 body just upstream of a re-entrant curve region 12, where flow separation of the boundary layer is expected to occur. The vortex generators ll serve to delay the onset of boundary flow separation by increasing the energy of the ~luid flow, thus significantly reducing form drag.
Figures 4a to 4f illustrate suitable vortex generators 11, which can be placed, preferably attached to the athlete' s garment, such as a body suit 12, in a row just upstream of a curved portion of the athlete' s body.
D~ 75.nOC
43~
Figure 4a showff a simple wing shape, which is placed at an angle to the fluid flow. Pigure 4b shows a wedge shape, and Figure 4c show3 a Vee shape. Fig 4d shows a cylinder, Fic7~ure 4e a truncated sphere or cap, and Fig, 4f, an airfoil 5 section. I~ach of these devices will produce a trailing vortex when placed in a fluid stream.
Figures 5 and 6 show respectively the rear and f ront sides of a swimmer. The vortex generators 11 are placed in a row on the athlete' s head and bottom, both front and rear, 10 just upstream of the re-entrant curvature. Small vortices are generated, which delay the onset of boundary layer separation. As a result, form drag is significantly reduced and the athlete' 8 performance ~nhiln~
The vortex generators 11 can be conveniently formed as 15 part of the athlete's body suit 12, which can also employ conventional 8kin-friction reducing tP~hn--l o~y.
While the vortex generator is the preferred method of reducing the onset of boundary layer separation, other technio~ues can be employed a3 described above.
The invention is applicable to other sports, such as cycling where the athlete's body moves through a fluid medium. In the case of cycling, as shown in Figures 7 and 8, the vortex generators are similarly attached to the athlete' 8 body just upstream of points where boundary layer separation would tend to occur, i.e. in a line on the head, over the posterior ~nd on the inner and outer sides of the arms and legs. In the case of the head, they can be conveniently attached to the back of the cyclists helmet, as ~hown in Figures 7 and 8.
Figures 9 and 10 show8 a similar arrangement for a speed skater.
The preferred vortex generators for the arms and legs are stub cylinders are caps as shown in Figures 4d and 4e.
D~ eTrr\~1775.DOC
214~3~
I'he important ~oint is that the vortex generators are placed upstream of the points o anticipated flow separation. By delaying the onset of flow separation at the trailin~ surfaces form dra~ is reduced.
Claims (26)
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:-
1. A drag reducing arrangement for the body of an athlete body moving through a fluid medium, comprising means attachable to the athlete's body for delaying the onset of boundary layer separation at a trailing surface thereof.
2. A drag reducing arrangement as claimed in claim 1, wherein said attachable means comprises at least one vortex generator .
3. A drag reducing arrangement as claimed in claim 2, wherein said at least one vortex generator comprises an angled wing attachable to the athlete's body.
4. A drag reducing arrangement as claimed in claim 2, wherein said at least one vortex generator comprises a wedge attachable to the athlete's body
5 . A drag reducing arrangement as claimed in claim 2, wherein said at least one vortex generator comprises a V-shaped form attachable to the athlete's body.
6. A drag reducing arrangement as claimed in claim 2, wherein said at least one vortex generator comprises a stub cylinder attachable to the athlete's body.
7. A drag reducing arrangement as claimed in claim 2, comprising a plurality of said vortex generators arranged in a row.
8. A method of reducing drag for the body of an athlete body moving through a fluid medium, comprising delaying the onset of boundary layer separation at a trailing surface thereof.
9. A method as claimed in claim 8, wherein an array of boundary layer separation delaying devices is placed on the athlete's body upstream of points of anticipated flow separation .
10. A method as claimed in claim 9, wherein said boundary layer separation delaying devices are vortex generators.
11. A method as claimed in claim 8, wherein said boundary layer separation delaying device are arranged in the head and posterior regions of the athlete.
12. A method as claimed in claim 11, wherein said boundary layer separation delaying devices are also arranged along the sides of the arms and legs.
13. An athlete's garment having attached thereto means for delaying the onset of boundary layer separation at a trailing surface of the athlete's body.
14. An athlete's garment as claimed in claim 13, wherein said means comprise at least one vortex generator.
15. An athlete's garment as claimed in claim 14, wherein said at least one vortex generator comprises an angled wing.
16. An athlete's garment as claimed in claim 14, wherein said at least one vortex generator comprises a wedge.
17. An athlete's garment as claimed in claim 14, wherein said at least one vortex generator comprises a V-shaped form.
18. An athlete's garment as claimed in claim 14, comprising a row of said vortex generators arranged in the head and posterior regions.
19. An athlete's garment as claimed in claim 18, wherein said vortex generators are V-shaped forms.
20. An athlete's garment as claimed in claim 14, comprising a row of said vortex generators arranged along the sides of the arms and legs.
21. An athlete's garment as claimed in claim 20, wherein said vortex generators are stub cylinders.
22. An athlete's body suit having provided thereon means for delaying the onset of boundary layer separation at trailing surfaces thereof during an athletic activity, said means comprising vortex generators located a points just upstream of said trailing curved surfaces.
23 . An athlete's body suit as claimed in claim 22, comprising a row of vortex generatorsa in the head and posterior regions, and along the sides of the arms and legs.
24. An athletic helmet comprising means extending thereacross on the top surface thereof to delay the onset of boundary layer separation.
25. An athletic helmet as claimed in claim 24, wherein said means comprise a row of vortex generators.
26. An athletic helmet as claimed in claim 24, wherein said vortex generators are V-shaped forms.
Priority Applications (8)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002144350A CA2144350A1 (en) | 1995-03-10 | 1995-03-10 | Drag reducing arrangement for athlete |
| EP96904696A EP0813372B1 (en) | 1995-03-10 | 1996-03-08 | Drag reducing arrangement for athlete |
| PCT/CA1996/000147 WO1996028052A1 (en) | 1995-03-10 | 1996-03-08 | Drag reducing arrangement for athlete |
| CA002214858A CA2214858A1 (en) | 1995-03-10 | 1996-03-08 | Drag reducing arrangement for athlete |
| AU48734/96A AU4873496A (en) | 1995-03-10 | 1996-03-08 | Drag reducing arrangement for athlete |
| DE69610827T DE69610827T2 (en) | 1995-03-10 | 1996-03-08 | RESISTANCE-REDUCING ARRANGEMENT FOR SPORTSMEN |
| US08/613,515 US5734990A (en) | 1995-03-10 | 1996-03-11 | Wearable article for athlete with vortex generators to reduce form drag |
| US09/026,727 US5887280A (en) | 1995-03-10 | 1998-02-20 | Wearable article for athlete with vortex generators to reduce form drag |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002144350A CA2144350A1 (en) | 1995-03-10 | 1995-03-10 | Drag reducing arrangement for athlete |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2144350A1 true CA2144350A1 (en) | 1996-09-11 |
Family
ID=4155397
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002144350A Abandoned CA2144350A1 (en) | 1995-03-10 | 1995-03-10 | Drag reducing arrangement for athlete |
Country Status (6)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5734990A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0813372B1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU4873496A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2144350A1 (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69610827T2 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1996028052A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (45)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5887280A (en) * | 1995-03-10 | 1999-03-30 | Waring; John | Wearable article for athlete with vortex generators to reduce form drag |
| US5819322A (en) * | 1997-06-23 | 1998-10-13 | Dicker; Timothy P. | Energy conservative/expenditure garment |
| US5819315A (en) * | 1997-08-13 | 1998-10-13 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Faired athletic garment |
| WO2000015961A1 (en) * | 1998-09-16 | 2000-03-23 | Lm Glasfiber A/S | Wind turbine blade with vortex generator |
| WO2000045656A2 (en) * | 1999-02-06 | 2000-08-10 | Helmut Wolfgang Merten | Covering or garments |
| NL1013310C1 (en) * | 1999-02-08 | 2000-08-10 | Gierveld Beheer Bv | Cloth for sportswear, its use for the manufacture of sportswear and sportswear. |
| GB0213551D0 (en) * | 2002-06-13 | 2002-07-24 | Univ Nottingham | Controlling boundary layer fluid flow |
| FR2858795B1 (en) * | 2003-08-13 | 2006-12-01 | Peugeot Citroen Automobiles Sa | AERODYNAMIC DEVICE FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE AND A MOTOR VEHICLE EQUIPPED WITH SUCH AERODYNAMIC DEVICE |
| US7472428B2 (en) | 2004-03-30 | 2009-01-06 | Nike, Inc. | Swim cap with multiple durometers |
| JP2006045738A (en) * | 2004-08-09 | 2006-02-16 | Yamaha Motor Co Ltd | Wear for overriding type vehicle rider |
| FR2878489B1 (en) * | 2004-11-26 | 2007-03-30 | Peugeot Citroen Automobiles Sa | DEVICE FOR REDUCING AERODYNAMIC EFFORTS OF A MOTOR VEHICLE AND MOTOR VEHICLE EQUIPPED WITH SUCH A DEVICE |
| CN101454564B (en) | 2006-04-02 | 2014-04-23 | 考特能源有限公司 | Wind turbine with slender blade |
| US20070284848A1 (en) | 2006-05-23 | 2007-12-13 | Nike, Inc. | Drag-reducing structure |
| GB2444803B (en) * | 2006-12-15 | 2009-08-05 | Speedo Int Ltd | Garments |
| GB2444804B (en) * | 2006-12-15 | 2009-04-01 | Speedo Int Ltd | Elasticated sports garments |
| US7941869B2 (en) * | 2007-02-09 | 2011-05-17 | Nike, Inc. | Apparel with reduced drag coefficient |
| US20080256675A1 (en) * | 2007-04-17 | 2008-10-23 | Joseph Di Lorenzo | Swimsuit having compression panels |
| US20090038047A1 (en) * | 2007-04-17 | 2009-02-12 | Joseph Di Lorenzo | Swimsuit having compression panels |
| ES2345583B1 (en) * | 2007-05-31 | 2011-07-28 | GAMESA INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY, S.L. | AEROGENERATOR SHOVEL WITH ANTI-NOISE DEVICES. |
| US7810867B2 (en) * | 2008-04-14 | 2010-10-12 | Fastskinz, Inc. | Vehicle with drag-reducing outer surface |
| DE102008022504B4 (en) * | 2008-05-07 | 2012-11-29 | Airbus Operations Gmbh | Switchable vortex generator and array formed therewith and uses thereof |
| DE102008033005A1 (en) * | 2008-07-14 | 2010-03-18 | Airbus Deutschland Gmbh | Aerodynamic flap and wings |
| AU2009292717B2 (en) * | 2008-09-19 | 2014-10-23 | Wobben Properties Gmbh | Wind turbine with low induction tips |
| US8757701B2 (en) * | 2010-01-15 | 2014-06-24 | Aeroserve Technologies, Ltd. | Drag reduction device for transport vehicles having randomized irregular shaped edge vortex generating channels |
| US8662854B1 (en) | 2010-05-21 | 2014-03-04 | Fastskinz, Inc. | Turbine with turbulence inducing surface |
| US8047801B2 (en) * | 2010-06-23 | 2011-11-01 | General Electric Company | Wind turbine blades with aerodynamic vortex elements |
| US8539615B1 (en) * | 2010-10-07 | 2013-09-24 | Jeff Carver | Shirt comprising protrusions on back side |
| US9039381B2 (en) | 2010-12-17 | 2015-05-26 | Vestas Wind Systems A/S | Wind turbine blade and method for manufacturing a wind turbine blade with vortex generators |
| US8832868B2 (en) * | 2011-04-04 | 2014-09-16 | Doug Owen | Garment with attached flags |
| US9429071B2 (en) * | 2011-06-23 | 2016-08-30 | Continuum Dynamics, Inc. | Supersonic engine inlet diffuser with deployable vortex generators |
| US9056662B2 (en) * | 2012-02-29 | 2015-06-16 | Nike, Inc. | Wetsuits with hydrodynamic interlocking and kinesiologic features |
| CN104364517B (en) | 2012-03-13 | 2017-10-24 | 柯尔顿控股有限公司 | The root of blade of torsion |
| US10238156B2 (en) | 2015-01-13 | 2019-03-26 | Under Armour, Inc. | Suit for athletic activities |
| US10151325B2 (en) * | 2015-04-08 | 2018-12-11 | General Electric Company | Gas turbine diffuser strut including a trailing edge flap and methods of assembling the same |
| US10716340B2 (en) * | 2015-05-27 | 2020-07-21 | Nike, Inc. | System and device for affecting drag properties of an object |
| GB2547928A (en) * | 2016-03-03 | 2017-09-06 | Totalsim Ltd | Improvements in or relating to fabrics |
| US10400744B2 (en) * | 2016-04-28 | 2019-09-03 | General Electric Company | Wind turbine blade with noise reducing micro boundary layer energizers |
| US10548358B2 (en) | 2016-08-16 | 2020-02-04 | Under Armour, Inc. | Suit for athletic activities |
| WO2018064310A1 (en) | 2016-09-28 | 2018-04-05 | Under Armour, Inc. | Apparel for athletic activities |
| US11019855B2 (en) * | 2017-05-31 | 2021-06-01 | Nike, Inc. | Vortex-generator device |
| USD928456S1 (en) | 2017-08-16 | 2021-08-24 | Under Armour, Inc. | Athletic suit |
| CN113226092B (en) * | 2018-12-06 | 2023-08-22 | 彪马欧洲股份公司 | Method and athletic garment for monitoring or visualizing running speed of athlete |
| US11039550B1 (en) * | 2020-04-08 | 2021-06-15 | Google Llc | Heat sink with turbulent structures |
| US10905175B1 (en) | 2020-05-21 | 2021-02-02 | Tyr Sport, Inc. | Swimsuit with tension bands and reinforcement liners |
| WO2022140040A2 (en) * | 2020-12-03 | 2022-06-30 | The Government Of The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Methods and apparatuses for reducing engine noise |
Family Cites Families (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2800291A (en) * | 1950-10-24 | 1957-07-23 | Stephens Arthur Veryan | Solid boundary surface for contact with a relatively moving fluid medium |
| US4075714A (en) * | 1976-11-15 | 1978-02-28 | Sierra Engineering Co. | Helmet characterized by negative lift |
| US4455045A (en) * | 1981-10-26 | 1984-06-19 | Wheeler Gary O | Means for maintaining attached flow of a flowing medium |
| DE8316411U1 (en) * | 1983-06-04 | 1984-04-05 | Schuberth-Werk Gmbh & Co Kg, 3300 Braunschweig | crash helmet |
| US5380578A (en) * | 1988-06-30 | 1995-01-10 | Arlington Fabrics Corporation | Elastic fabric having a grooved outer surface and garments made therefrom |
| US5052053A (en) * | 1988-12-05 | 1991-10-01 | O'neill, Inc. | Garment for aquatic activities having increased elasticity and method of making same |
| US5058837A (en) * | 1989-04-07 | 1991-10-22 | Wheeler Gary O | Low drag vortex generators |
| US5106331A (en) * | 1989-05-26 | 1992-04-21 | Jairo Lizarazu | Apparatus for body surfing and method of making the same |
| US5033116A (en) * | 1989-07-24 | 1991-07-23 | Descente Ltd. | Clothing for reducing fluid resistance |
| US5406647A (en) * | 1992-03-16 | 1995-04-18 | Wear And Tear, Inc. | Clothing integrated aerodynamic modules for cycling, skating and other speed sports |
| WO1993018673A1 (en) * | 1992-03-16 | 1993-09-30 | Lew Paul E | Aerodynamic modules for cycling, skating and other speed sports |
-
1995
- 1995-03-10 CA CA002144350A patent/CA2144350A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
1996
- 1996-03-08 WO PCT/CA1996/000147 patent/WO1996028052A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1996-03-08 AU AU48734/96A patent/AU4873496A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1996-03-08 EP EP96904696A patent/EP0813372B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1996-03-08 DE DE69610827T patent/DE69610827T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1996-03-11 US US08/613,515 patent/US5734990A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| DE69610827D1 (en) | 2000-12-07 |
| WO1996028052A1 (en) | 1996-09-19 |
| AU4873496A (en) | 1996-10-02 |
| DE69610827T2 (en) | 2001-05-23 |
| EP0813372A1 (en) | 1997-12-29 |
| EP0813372B1 (en) | 2000-11-02 |
| US5734990A (en) | 1998-04-07 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2144350A1 (en) | Drag reducing arrangement for athlete | |
| US5887280A (en) | Wearable article for athlete with vortex generators to reduce form drag | |
| US5809567A (en) | Method and system for reducing drag on the movement of bluff bodies through a fluid medium and increasing heat transfer | |
| US7941869B2 (en) | Apparel with reduced drag coefficient | |
| CA1222852A (en) | Crash helmet | |
| EP0411351B1 (en) | Clothing for reducing fluid resistance | |
| EP3311686B1 (en) | Low drag garment | |
| US5092599A (en) | Wood golf club head | |
| WO2004089741A1 (en) | Method for reducing kinetic friction | |
| US9963187B1 (en) | Aerodynamic bicycle frame | |
| CN110636767B (en) | Cut-back helmet | |
| US5097538A (en) | Helmet | |
| CA2713362A1 (en) | Shock bump | |
| JP3714722B2 (en) | Peeling suppression device | |
| Pendergast et al. | Application of theoretical principles to swimsuit drag reduction | |
| JPH08501476A (en) | Low aerodynamic drag baseball bat | |
| Crouch et al. | A quasi-static investigation of the effect of leg position on cyclist aerodynamic drag | |
| KR20200004457A (en) | Structure for reducing the drag of a ship and its application | |
| CA2214858A1 (en) | Drag reducing arrangement for athlete | |
| EP0914046A1 (en) | Reducing drag on bodies moving through fluid mediums | |
| CN209192148U (en) | A kind of bionical marine vortex generator | |
| RU2046585C1 (en) | Suit for speed kinds of sports | |
| Liu et al. | Efficient suction control of unsteadiness of turbulent wing-plate junction flows | |
| PAN | The experimental approach to the LEBU on turbulent drag reduction | |
| Xu et al. | An experimental study on flow and heat transfer around a single cone-shaped film cooling hole with inclined angle of 30 deg |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| FZDE | Discontinued |